The Biden Administration and All Things Politics

[Gameface]

Did you read what I was responding to? He said she was in jail for possession in Russia and he wants to draw comparisons. I was showing that the possession charges even in Russia are drummed up and the possession charge is tacked on to other charges like smuggling.
She was not in prison in Russia for simple drug possession, just like folks in the US are not in prison for simple drug possession charges because the prison system wants to tack charges onto people to extend sentences, increase parole etc.

Sure. I guess I'm not clear on your larger point. Yes, things get tacked on. Her crime was possession and smuggling. Are you trying to claim victory for finding a fairly simple error in what fish said?

I don't know what typical sentences for that crime typically are in Russia. 9 years in a gulag seems outrageously excessive. I know that in places like the U.S., Canada, Australia, a person who had done that exact thing would most likely walk out of the airport having paid a fine, having the illegal substance confiscated and being noted for increased scrutiny when going through customs in the future.

Are you arguing that her sentence was justified? That she would have faced the same consequences here for the exact same thing? That "both sides" suck because we didn't get enough in exchange for our prisoner?

I'm just not getting what idea your clarification is intended to advance, unless you just wanted to clarify for the sake of clarification.

 

[Gameface]

remembering the one of a kind Herschel Walker Senate campaign

 

[The Thriller]

See, we were discussing getting Griner out of prison for possessing a gram of marijauna.
Then mongoose said that we should focus on people in america who are imprisoned for drug possession.

So if we are making this comparison then lets make it apples to apples.

Griner was imprisoned for possessing a gram of marijuana. Are there americans in prisons in america for possessing a gram of marijuana? According to mongoose the answer is no. So his compaint of america having people like griner in american prisons was just a falsehood.
Glad we got that settled. Moving on……


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app

That’s not how partisanship works. My party and its leaders are amazing and yours sucks no matter what they do. (I know you don’t have a party).

 

[fishonjazz]

Sure. I guess I'm not clear on your larger point. Yes, things get tacked on. Her crime was possession and smuggling. Are you trying to claim victory for finding a fairly simple error in what fish said?

I don't know what typical sentences for that crime typically are in Russia. 9 years in a gulag seems outrageously excessive. I know that in places like the U.S., Canada, Australia, a person who had done that exact thing would most likely walk out of the airport having paid a fine, having the illegal substance confiscated and being noted for increased scrutiny when going through customs in the future.

Are you arguing that her sentence was justified? That she would have faced the same consequences here for the exact same thing? That "both sides" suck because we didn't get enough in exchange for our prisoner?

I'm just not getting what idea your clarification is intended to advance, unless you just wanted to clarify for the sake of clarification.

He is arguing because something happened with bidens name attached to it. Thats the only reason really.


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[LogGrad98]

remembering the one of a kind Herschel Walker Senate campaign

This erection is indeed for the people.

 

[The Thriller]

Sure. I guess I'm not clear on your larger point. Yes, things get tacked on. Her crime was possession and smuggling. Are you trying to claim victory for finding a fairly simple error in what fish said?

I don't know what typical sentences for that crime typically are in Russia. 9 years in a gulag seems outrageously excessive. I know that in places like the U.S., Canada, Australia, a person who had done that exact thing would most likely walk out of the airport having paid a fine, having the illegal substance confiscated and being noted for increased scrutiny when going through customs in the future.

Are you arguing that her sentence was justified? That she would have faced the same consequences here for the exact same thing? That "both sides" suck because we didn't get enough in exchange for our prisoner?

I'm just not getting what idea your clarification is intended to advance, unless you just wanted to clarify for the sake of clarification.

Simple question, how do we know that she was guilty of what she was accused of doing in Russia? Russia isn’t exactly a good faith actor. I’m old enough to remember earlier this year when they claimed they had to invade Ukraine and liberate it from NATO and Nazis. I’m also old enough to remember when Putin told Trump at Helsinki that Russia had nothing to do with the 2016 election and then tried to peddle disinformation that Zelensky and Ukraine hacked the DNC’s servers.

I’m just curious why we all take Russia’s word here, as if they would easily lie about invading Ukraine or influencing our elections but wouldn’t ever ever ever dream of arresting a high profile American athlete under bogus charges?

 

[Mongoose]

I see now that this is just a big circle jerk so I wont be back. Ya'll have some really bad takes on human rights, war, and politics in general.
Keep the blinders on folks. Keep discussing among only partison folks and see what you can learn.

 

[Bucknutz]

I see now that this is just a big circle jerk so I wont be back. Ya'll have some really bad takes on human rights, war, and politics in general.
Keep the blinders on folks. Keep discussing among only partison folks and see what you can learn.

View: https://twitter.com/billym2k/status/1601265060416192513?s=46&t=vW21G6preZUeYFF1YH4lfg


@Mongoose you’re absolutely right that it is left leaning in here but I appreciate your responses and content. Please stay, there needs to be more people with different views in here.

 

[One Brow]

I see now that this is just a big circle jerk so I wont be back.

You don't like to have fun?

Ya'll have some really bad takes on human rights, war, and politics in general.
Keep the blinders on folks. Keep discussing among only partison folks and see what you can learn.

You keep pointing out things most people already agree with, and seem surprised that we are not shocked.

 

[Gameface]

You don't like to have fun?


You keep pointing out things most people already agree with, and seem surprised that we are not shocked.

Exactly. I wanted to know what his point was. Apparently he didn't have one. He wanted to present a fact and then sit back and say "see, SEE!" I was like what is it I'm supposed to see? So yeah, he's out of here.

 

[Gameface]

Simple question, how do we know that she was guilty of what she was accused of doing in Russia? Russia isn’t exactly a good faith actor. I’m old enough to remember earlier this year when they claimed they had to invade Ukraine and liberate it from NATO and Nazis. I’m also old enough to remember when Putin told Trump at Helsinki that Russia had nothing to do with the 2016 election and then tried to peddle disinformation that Zelensky and Ukraine hacked the DNC’s servers.

I’m just curious why we all take Russia’s word here, as if they would easily lie about invading Ukraine or influencing our elections but wouldn’t ever ever ever dream of arresting a high profile American athlete under bogus charges?

Because her response was that she had an Rx for that in the U.S. and she forgot it was in her luggage.

 

[The Thriller]

Because her response was that she had an Rx for that in the U.S. and she forgot it was in her luggage.

And Russia would never compel anyone to make a false statement?

My pt is, a country that values human life zero percent and is actively trying to undermine the west shouldn’t be given credibility in anything they say.

 

[Gameface]

And Russia would never compel anyone to make a false statement?

My pt is, a country that values human life zero percent and is actively trying to undermine the west shouldn’t be given credibility in anything they say.

Doesn't sound like the kind of statement that would be forced. It's a fairly reasonable excuse and takes intent out of the equation but doesn't alter the fact that it belongs to her. It doesn't give Russia any credibility. I don't have the exact specifics but there was a trial and Griner was able to communicate, possibly in person (?) with people from the U.S.. If there is evidence that it was planted and that her statements were coerced then fine but why do the Tucker Carlson "I'm just asking questions..." routine?

 

[gandalfe]

Doesn't sound like the kind of statement that would be forced. It's a fairly reasonable excuse and takes intent out of the equation but doesn't alter the fact that it belongs to her. It doesn't give Russia any credibility. I don't have the exact specifics but there was a trial and Griner was able to communicate, possibly in person (?) with people from the U.S.. If there is evidence that it was planted and that her statements were coerced then fine but why do the Tucker Carlson "I'm just asking questions..." routine?

It was also made pretty clear in a couple of articles I read (I can try to hunt them down, but it was from the time of the trial) that nothing could proceed on a diplomatic front until she was convicted, and that once you go to trial in Russia you're probably going to be convicted anyway (particularly if you're a political prisoner, which only the most idiotic would argue she wasn't), so she may have just said it was hers to speed things along.

<EDIT> Here is one of the aforementioned articles: https://theathletic.com/3407682/2022/07/08/brittney-griner-russia/

 

[The Thriller]

Doesn't sound like the kind of statement that would be forced. It's a fairly reasonable excuse and takes intent out of the equation but doesn't alter the fact that it belongs to her. It doesn't give Russia any credibility. I don't have the exact specifics but there was a trial and Griner was able to communicate, possibly in person (?) with people from the U.S.. If there is evidence that it was planted and that her statements were coerced then fine but why do the Tucker Carlson "I'm just asking questions..." routine?

When has Carlson acted in good faith? He acts in bad faith to keep the white grievance audience watching his white nationalist power hour. What motivation would I have?

Since Russia is one of the most corrupt places on earth, I think we absolutely should be asking questions.

1. If Griner weren’t a gay American player, think she would’ve been arrested? If she had been a straight Hungarian or Chinese player (Putin allies), think she would’ve been arrested?
2. If Russia hadn’t been launching its war against Ukraine and of America hadn't supported Ukraine, think she would’ve been arrested and then sent to what essentially a gulag to be used to blackmail their arch enemy?

Russia is one of the most lawless countries on earth. They let drug possession and worse slide all the time. Laws are meaningless in an autocratic hellhole like Russia. They’ve lied countless times to us before. They recently helped Trump win in 2016 and were trying to help him win again in 2020. That’s why Donald was impeached the first time. If there’s ever a time to “just ask questions”, this would be it.

 

[The Thriller]

It was also made pretty clear in a couple of articles I read (I can try to hunt them down, but it was from the time of the trial) that nothing could proceed on a diplomatic front until she was convicted, and that once you go to trial in Russia you're probably going to be convicted anyway (particularly if you're a political prisoner, which only the most idiotic would argue she wasn't), so she may have just said it was hers to speed things along.

<EDIT> Here is one of the aforementioned articles: https://theathletic.com/3407682/2022/07/08/brittney-griner-russia/

Good post.

Nor does it really matter what Russian laws say. We should take everything they say with a grain of salt. All that matters is that Putin had the motive and power to arrest her and hold her for ransom. They aren’t good faith actors and it wouldn’t be beyond them to trump up drug charges against Griner. I mean, hello, they invaded Ukraine over false pretenses. They poison enemies with radioactive tea. They assassinate businessmen, human rights activists, and political opponents under false charges of tax fraud. Putin bombed apartments in his own country to frame Chechen terrorists and to boost his campaign to become president. Why couldn’t he lie about Griner?

I’m just saying that we shouldn’t take what Putin says at face value.

1999 Russian apartment bombings - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Gameface]

It was also made pretty clear in a couple of articles I read (I can try to hunt them down, but it was from the time of the trial) that nothing could proceed on a diplomatic front until she was convicted, and that once you go to trial in Russia you're probably going to be convicted anyway (particularly if you're a political prisoner, which only the most idiotic would argue she wasn't), so she may have just said it was hers to speed things along.

Well I guess within a day or two she will make a statement in the U.S.

 

[gandalfe]

Well I guess within a day or two she will make a statement in the U.S.

Like I mentioned, it's entirely possible that the State Department has asked her to refrain from saying anything incendiary to prevent jeopardizing other negotiations. I guess we'll kind of have to see what she says and her tone.

 

[Gameface]

Like I mentioned, it's entirely possible that the State Department has asked her to refrain from saying anything incendiary to prevent jeopardizing other negotiations. I guess we'll kind of have to see what she says and her tone.

Yeah, I'm also anxiously waiting to find out if there is a magical invisible pink unicorn in the room with me. Who knows? Can't trust invisible creatures in general to stay out of the house, amiright?

Why speculate about something that we have no reason to think is true when all evidence points to a much more reasonable answer?

 

[Gameface]

I really try to not just spam this guy's stuff, and a lot of times that's easy because I don't agree with him. But I want to make a specific point that piggybacks off what he says in this video.



The point I want to make is that the Republican party has really shot themselves in the foot by calling everything "socialism." They are pointing at broadly popular public welfare ideas and screaming like toddlers who didn't get the candy they wanted that it is socialism. They are pointing at heath care ideas that would give Americans something close to what the rest of the industrialized world has had for decades and stomping their feet, crossing their arms and calling it SOCIALISM!!! They are pointing at environmentalism and calling it SOCIALISM!!! They oppose an increase to minimum wage because... SOCIALISM!!!

They don't realize they are popularizing the concept of socialism amongst all but the oldest and most angry in our society. They are bringing up an entire generation that hears that every decent idea they see that could make the lives of average Americans better is socialism.

I mean we could have just called it welfare and handouts and made good faith arguments about why those things disincentivize hard work and innovation, but that isn't what has happened. They just call it all socialism, while lumping in many things that are in fact NOT socialism, then calling centrist capitalist Democrats extreme socialists.

Republicans have effectively changed the definition of socialism and what a socialist is to the point that many if not most young people look at the situation and consider if they are actually socialists themselves.

So thank you neocons, I'm NOT a socialist, but in order to oppose fascists I'm probably going to have to align with a coming wave of actual socialism that you have created. I mean I'm down for a better health insurance system. I don't want socialism. But I will pick socialism over fascism 10 times out of 10. So thanks.