Can we reflect though? The biggest issue I see is we are hoping Bradley can be like Gobert and having him play the same role as him when he has completely different strengths and weaknesses. Once we acknowledge this and start playing to his strengths and trying to look to minimise his weaknesses then we can truly judge him. Playing alongside a low effort and low IQ player in Jeff Green doesn't help to hide his defense, same as playing alongside a low IQ PG in Mudiay. Stagger the minutes so that our best defensive wing (O'neale) shares the floor with him. Then we can judge what his defense is truly like whilst playing as a drop big which in itself might not be the best way of defending whilst Rudy is resting.
As for his offense, he is every bit as good as Rudy at setting a pick and that in itself is a valuable skill set. But beyond setting picks and going for offensive boards he isn't used at all on offense, regardless of whether he is open or not. His team mates need to understand that unlike Gobert they can throw more difficult passes as Bradley has the hands to catch them, whether he can then finish the play remains to be seen but he needs to be given the chance to prove that which isn't happening at present. Similarly when he runs the floor and beats his opponent down the floor and has a mismatch that pass has to be made to him, he has shown he can finish over smaller guys but our guards are to slow at 1. bringing the ball up the floor and 2. getting the ball to him.
I think if we are hoping Bradley can come into the game and simply try and hold things together whilst Rudy rest then we are asking for trouble but if we acknowledge he is different and can fill up the box score whilst Rudy rest then we can potentially make it work. Break even playing a fast pace scoring 15 points each whilst Rudy rest rather than being outscored 5 to 10 playing a slow pace.