I get the on paper criticism and wanting more, but again, why should it "have been worth more" if DL didn't have a stasher he saw any value in?
Because of the depth in this years draft.
I get the on paper criticism and wanting more, but again, why should it "have been worth more" if DL didn't have a stasher he saw any value in?
Jarnell Stokes killing it today. Per Alex Kennedy (basketball insiders) today "Jarnell Stokes is dominating right now. He was such a steal for Memphis in the early second round. I love his game". I'm surprised we couldn't get more for this guy, this 2nd round was shockingly deep. It's going to be hard to watch him succeed.
Jarnell Stokes killing it today. Per Alex Kennedy (basketball insiders) today "Jarnell Stokes is dominating right now. He was such a steal for Memphis in the early second round. I love his game". I'm surprised we couldn't get more for this guy, this 2nd round was shockingly deep. It's going to be hard to watch him succeed.
Imagine if this guy turns out to be the second coming of Karl Malone, or even Paul Millsap.
Perhaps "opportunity cost" isn't exactly the right term, but there is definitely a cost associated with it. To wit: if a team does a trade like that every year, they will never ever get the pick. Therefore doing a trade like that costs the team something.