I agree. Based upon current events, this is our depth chart this season:
PG: Trey Burke/Danté Exum, Raul Neto/Garrett
SG: Alec Burks/Danté Exum
SF: Gordon Hayward (re-sign), Rodney Hood
PF: Enes Kanter, Jeremy Evans
C: Derrick Favors, Rudy Gobert
Still need to use some salary to get to the floor.
What next?
Well, we do still have the 35th pick.
Zero chance Trey Burke starts ahead of Dante
Exum is on a whole other level
I completely disagree with this. Filling needs is for Free Agency and trades. The draft is about getting the best player you can and work with or around his position. Besides we do need Sg/Pg's. When Burke missed time we sucked major *** last season. And this guy looks to be more of a passing PG instead of a shooting PG like Burke.My problem isn't that I don't trust the office to evaluate talent, my problem is that the whole approach is wrong. Picking the best player available is a bad idea. You fill needs. The Jazz don't need a PG or a SG.
Bye bye, Trey.
I love the pick. AG would have been extremely mediocre at 5, IMO I think Orlando whiffed huge on that one.
There was a clear cut top 4 in this draft that had star potential and one of them fell into our laps. We had to swing for the fences.
Agreed. Besides. . . with such a young team there's going to be plenty of minutes to go around. Dante will get time at both 1 and 2 to figure out where he fits best.Would be really awkward for Trey to be taking pictures with his replacement one year after he was drafted. My guess is that Trey won't be traded this year at least.
It happened. There were many better choices.No please
That's who I wanted too. Maybe at 35?I'd be okay with KJ McDaniels now at 23.
I agree. I will say that Trey's days are numbered as a starting PG.As a rookie, I don't see a 19 year old starting ahead of the incumbent. Maybe eventually, but not likely next year.
Burn![size/HUGE] fixed [/size];856781 said:guess which one of these guys will be a better defender. Thx.