10,000 posts?! Good god!
Nash has interest in Utah?
- Thread starter margodydek
- Start date
10,000 posts?! Good god!
Just goes to shows that he posts a lot of bull ****. You can take about a third of what he says as being worth reading.
Actually .. Cy is one of the better posters here.
orangello
Well-Known Member
A better way to say what I just said.
MoTappin
Well-Known Member
Nash's biggest value comes in helping develop Favors for the P&R. Harris played well at the end of the season, but he's not a big P&R guy...never will be. Nash also brings leadership (which we desperately need) and the ability to bring along a younger PG for a couple of years. Nash may not grow with the team, but he could help the team grow. Might be just what we need and he's still playing at a very high level. He would be a great fit here. Let him retire here and then make him the PG coach. 
BluesRocker
Banned
Yes lets sign him to 10 mil per year and give up on signing a top FA for 3 years
billyshelby
Well-Known Member
If we signed him to 3 at 10, we'd lose all of 1.5 million next year when we can't spend anyway. For the next 2 years after that, who could we sign that would give us better value than Nash at 10 per year? This is a guy who's missed 30 games in a decade. An absolute lock for 50/40/90 as a guard. 10 assists are a given. And he's only posted an under 20 PER once in his career (19).
Not to mention how profitable it would be to the Jazz's bottom line despite a 10 million dollar salary. I can't think of something with more bang-for-the-buck for those three years than signing Nash (within reason).
billyshelby
Well-Known Member
Which is why I'd pay him more. Just win the auction.
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
In all honesty, I'd be more thrilled to sign Nash, than Harden. Obviously, Harden is a potential perennial All-Star, but I feel like Nash could just completely change the career of Derrick Favors, while furthering the development of Kanter, Hayward, and Burks.
Think of what Stoudemire's career would be like if he never played with Nash. Plus, we have Hayward and Burks as potentially acclimating to players like Harden. Couple that with with Nash and Favors running the P&R, and the scenario just makes my pants wet
Think of what Stoudemire's career would be like if he never played with Nash. Plus, we have Hayward and Burks as potentially acclimating to players like Harden. Couple that with with Nash and Favors running the P&R, and the scenario just makes my pants wet
green
Well-Known Member
Couldn't we sign him to a 10 a year deal and still offer two max deals next summer?
I strongly disagree.
Weezur
Well-Known Member
This. Nash has maybe 2 more years left. Harden isn't even in his prime. Nash's offense seems completely different from the Jazz. We'd have to change a lot to use him effectively.
BluesRocker
Banned
I strongly agree with this. Which kind of makes it stronger.
BluesRocker
Banned
What you just said is one of the most insanely idiotic statements I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling incoherent response were you even close to something that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for reading your post. I award you no rep points and may god have mercy on your soul. Harden>Nash all day.
Hahhahah, nice reference. Rep'd.