AlaskanAssassin
Well-Known Member
Sometimes I think he completely full of crap. Like everyone, he's got good and bad.
I like Hollinger because of his unique view of things. He has a set statistical way of viewing performance, and he sticks to it regardless of what he might think otherwise. Everyone else is so subjective in their analysis that it makes me sick. I don't care if they were a former player/coach/GM, it seems they rarely give us insight that we can't see ourselves by simply watching the games.