Fair enough, I still get entertained conversing with you, but maybe one day ill get bored with it.![]()
I've said this plenty but franklin is possibly my favorite poster on here.
Fair enough, I still get entertained conversing with you, but maybe one day ill get bored with it.![]()
It's almost like he's not interested in honest dialogue and gets his rocks off by the reactions he gets from his ****posting and general trollery. It's befuddling to me that he has lasted as long as he has on this site. It's a f***ing joke, really.
Sent from my SM-G935V using JazzFanz mobile app
With 17 million Germans receiving assistance under the auspices of National Socialist People’s Welfare (NSV) by 1939, the agency “projected a powerful image of caring and support.”[4] The National Socialists provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft which promoted the collectivity of a “people’s community” where citizens would sacrifice themselves for the greater good. The NSV operated “8,000 day-nurseries” by 1939, and funded holiday homes for mothers, distributed additional food for large families, and was involved with a “wide variety of other facilities.”[5]
The Nazi social welfare provisions included old age insurance, rent supplements, unemployment and disability benefits, old-age homes, interest-free loans for married couples, along with healthcare insurance, which was not decreed mandatory until 1941.[6] One of the NSV branches, the Office of Institutional and Special Welfare, was responsible “for travellers’ aid at railway stations; relief for ex-convicts; ‘support’ for re-migrants from abroad; assistance for the physically disabled, hard-of-hearing, deaf, mute, and blind; relief for the elderly, homeless and alcoholics; and the fight against illicit drugs and epidemics.”[7] The Office of Youth Relief, which had 30,000 branch offices by 1941, took the job of supervising “social workers, corrective training, mediation assistance,” and dealing with judicial authorities to prevent juvenile delinquency.[8]
One of the NSV's premier activities was Winter Relief of the German People, which coordinated an annual drive to collect charity for the poor under the slogan: “None shall starve or freeze.” These social welfare programs represented a Hitlerian endeavor to lift the community above the individual while promoting the wellbeing of all bona fide citizens. As Hitler told a reporter in 1934, he was determined to give Germans “the highest possible standard of living.”[9]
Yeah, I'm not sure why you huys that are bugged by Dutch so much don't put him on ignore. I live that feature. I also don't get why people I put on ignore constantly follow my posts. Like, you hate my posts so much you can't help but read them and dislike them.
I try to make any "trolling" obvious and light and friendly. Most of the trolling I get accused of is a lack of understanding or perspective by the accuser.
Oh, and I used to troll the trolls too but that ran its course and got boring.
I am unclear why it matters where Hitler falls on the political spectrum, especially since the spectrum isn't black and white and isn't the same now as it was nearly 100 years ago. He had socialist policies, and white supremacist policies. He believed in white racial purity, while he also provided a form of universal healthcare and strong social programs to get them out of a depression.
But in this he also restricted it based on race.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_People's_Welfare
His was a strange mash-up of social programs and the worst racism ever known to mankind. I do not equate racism itself with modern right-wing politics. I think it falls out of the normal political spectrum. Just because modern racists identify with the right-wing does not mean all right-leaning people are racist.
This is a very weird topic of conversation. And really irrelevant.
I am unclear why it matters where Hitler falls on the political spectrum, especially since the spectrum isn't black and white and isn't the same now as it was nearly 100 years ago. He had socialist policies, and white supremacist policies. He believed in white racial purity, while he also provided a form of universal healthcare and strong social programs to get them out of a depression.
But in this he also restricted it based on race.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_People's_Welfare
His was a strange mash-up of social programs and the worst racism ever known to mankind. I do not equate racism itself with modern right-wing politics. I think it falls out of the normal political spectrum. Just because modern racists identify with the right-wing does not mean all right-leaning people are racist.
This is a very weird topic of conversation. And really irrelevant.
Then why are they called the national socialist party?!?!It has been explained in incredibly thorough scholarly detail that Hitler's fascism is extremely right wing, and not anything close to left-wing. Do a google search, and ignore all of the 4chan links that pop up.
Holy ****, man. Serriously?It has been explained in incredibly thorough scholarly detail that Hitler's fascism is extremely right wing, and not anything close to left-wing. Do a google search, and ignore all of the 4chan links that pop up.
social conservatism is absolutely correlated with racism, and social conservatism is a foundational feature of reactionary politics.
Curious as to what most of you guys think about him. If you haven't heard of him, he's definitely a polarizing figure, but damn, he's smart, articulated and comes at people full-throttle. I recommend googling him or youtubing him. I'm sure you've seen or heard him before.
There's been some interesting things that have gone on at CSULA this week with him and a speech title, When Diversity Becomes a Problem. Watch the talk on YouTube, he's pretty intense. I'll be on campus there in a few weeks and looks pretty crazy right now.
and
I personally don't necessarily believe that conservatism is correlated in racism. But it's difficult to argue against Dala's point when the OP of this thread certainly takes a racist approach to promote his radical right wing views and pump up his mancrush, Ben Shapiro.
"When Diversity Becomes a Problem"
But remember, that's somehow not racism? I’d love for someone here to use “diversity as a problem” in a non-racist context. Right? Think about it. When is diversity a problem and when should it be discouraged without ascribing to racist viewpoints?
What next? Archie pimping "The White Man's Burden" as “intellectually stimulating?”
LMFAO...
It has been explained in incredibly thorough scholarly detail that Hitler's fascism is extremely right wing, and not anything close to left-wing. Do a google search, and ignore all of the 4chan links that pop up.
social conservatism is absolutely correlated with racism, and social conservatism is a foundational feature of reactionary politics.
Then why are they called the national socialist party?!?!
CH3CKMATE LIBTARDO.
/S
Sent from my SM-G935V using JazzFanz mobile app
his party was called socialist hogwash drivel party(to lazy to search for full official name) but i concede this as north korea is called a democratic republic.
Ben Shapiro may not be overtly racist, but he does argue that no such thing as institutional racism exists in America, which allows it to perpetuate.
I don't get why people are so enamoured with him. Maybe I'm missing something but he comes across to me as just a younger, slightly less blowhardy and hopefully less rapey Bill O'Reilley.
Sent from my SM-G935V using JazzFanz mobile app