Trey Burke comment about legit center was discussed here.
https://jazzfanz.com/showthread.php?30435-What-s-going-on-with-Burke&highlight=legit+center+burke
If you have a problem with me saying Trey Burke's shooting sucks that is your problem.
I no longer have the time or the crayons to talk with you unfortunately.
I heard that Burke said that Jazz need to draft a legit Center. Complete disrespect to Kanter, Favors, and Gobert. Also Burke mentioned Stauskis was the best shooter he has ever played with (granted his statement was probably true but he never mentions anyone on the Jazz as good). It seems he feels he is too good for the Jazz or something. I really have a feeling Burke thinks he is better than he thinks he is moreso than most players. The only thing promising about Burke is that he has a very very nice Assist/TO ratio (Top 10 in the entire NBA). Everything else sucks, his athleticism sucks, his height sucks, his defense sucks, his shooting sucks. His rookie year stats and height are very similar to Johnny Flynn. Johnny didn't last 5 years in the NBA.
Well I guess that is one way to interpret his comments. How about this way? Favors and Kanter both think they are PFs and have stated such. So maybe Trey thinks that too. Gobert was no where near being ready last year and so his comment about needing a legitimate center isn't too off base. I guess he could have said something like hopefully Gobert is our center. However after last year no one thought Gobert was a starting center except Gobert homers. Gobert looked great in SL but he has yet to prove he is a starting center.
Nevertheless, since he was asked this during the draft, saying the Jazz need a starting center isn't so far fetched especially with the prospect of drafting Embiid was still possible. Why would Burke mention anyone on the Jazz last year as being a better shooter than Stauskis? There was no one on the Jazz even close to Staukis so his statement is true. What is wrong with that? He was actually saying a great thing about his former teammate. It sounds as though you want Trey to but his Jazz homer cap on and bow down to the Jazz Bear idol.
Remember these comments were at the draft and none of them show any lack of loyalty or truth to them. Now you might argue that center isn't the most important position of need but SF is a greater need. You nor Trey would be wrong stating that and I am sure it would open a discussion about which position is a greater need.
Personally, I see nothing wrong with what he said and I doubt any of his teammates took offense to it. Comments coming out of SL from the young guys were that Trey was being a leader and showing the guys the ropes and encouraging them.
Trey Burke comment about legit center was discussed here.
https://jazzfanz.com/showthread.php?30435-What-s-going-on-with-Burke&highlight=legit+center+burke
If you have a problem with me saying Trey Burke's shooting sucks that is your problem.
I no longer have the time or the crayons to talk with you unfortunately.
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];877927 said:My hate goggles will come off when he starts shooting in the neighborhood of 45%/37%
Snyder's empty post/double high screen offense will play up to Trey's strengths.
Corbin's offense allowed defenses to pack the paint and forced Trey to play to his weaknesses (long, contested 2s). This will not happen under Snyder and I expect his % to move up significantly. His assists will be about the same, but I expect they'll be of much higher quality.
The sky is falling, and you want to cheer it on as it comes down?
*boggle
I hope his assists go up, but I hang this hope on having outside shooters hitting more open 3's, and possibly post players hitting more close shots as defenders are forced to not leave the 3pt line to double/pack the paint. That would be our offensive utopia going as planned anyways.
Lol. Burke is now the sky falling? I guess you could always complain it's falling and that'll make it stop. Oh wait...
With Hayward running the O less and spot shouting more, along with Hood and Novak, and I think we will see the teams 3% average rise dramatically.
It didn’t seem to matter to USA Basketball, though
What didn't seem to matter?
Seriously what is with all of the negativity on this forum? I realize that Burke has been a bit of a disappoint so far, but it seems like more people are rooting for his failure so they can confirm their feelings about him as a player. I'm not saying everyone should pretend to love him, but do you need to **** on every Jazz player you don't like in every thread? It's getting really old.
I hope his assists go up, but I hang this hope on having outside shooters hitting more open 3's, and possibly post players hitting more close shots as defenders are forced to not leave the 3pt line to double/pack the paint. That would be our offensive utopia going as planned anyways.
Seriously what is with all of the negativity on this forum?
With Hayward running the O less and spot shouting more...
When a player plays good people love and when a player play bad people hate him. I used to be an Orlando Magic fan and the whole forum worshiped Dwight Howard saying stuff like he is even better than Shaq, Penny etc (before you know...). I am pretty sure if you go to the trailblazers forum they would love Damian Lillard. You think we should love a player unconditionally? If Trey Burke becomes a top 5 PG in the league everyone will go fanboy on him and say he is best PG in the entire league even if he isn't. Utah Jazz hasn't had that one player who overachieved (excluding second round picks) for a long time. If Trey Burke becomes Damian Lillard or Gordon Hayward becomes Paul George Jazz fanz will be more positive.
It is not so bad being a pessimist as you are rarely disappointed. On a disappointing team it shouldn't be surprising to see people gravitate towards pessimism.