What's new

Exotic Animal Trophy Hunting

Lol. If you're out there saying that hunting is senseless killing, then you're against hunting. The vast majority of the time, it's not senseless killing.
Ya, I'm against it but I go hunting with dad and brothers and never tell anyone that I think they shouldn't hunt lol.
Makes lots of sense. Please don't tell me what I'm for and what I'm against.

I don't understand why anyone would want to do synchronized diving and I would never do it.... So I must be against it!
 
How about growing cows, pigs and chicken to feed to humans?
No issues with that whatsoever.
I don't want to do it but I'm glad somebody else does.
 
The vast majority of the time, it's not senseless killing.

People who hunt for food (that they need to survive) and people who really do hunt only because of population control or protecting their livestock I understand.

I believe that very few hunters do it simply for population control or whatever noble cause. Most people hunt because they enjoy it. I think it's strange to get enjoyment out of killing things. But again, to each their own. I ain't trying to stop anybody.
 
Ya, I'm against it but I go hunting with dad and brothers and never tell anyone that I think they shouldn't hunt lol.
Makes lots of sense. Please don't tell me what I'm for and what I'm against.

I don't understand why anyone would want to do synchronized diving and I would never do it.... So I must be against it!

Fish, what you're saying isn't logical. If you're saying that hunting is senseless killing, you're essentially saying that you're against it. You can spin it however you want, but that's what those words mean.
 
Fish, what you're saying isn't logical. If you're saying that hunting is senseless killing, you're essentially saying that you're against it. You can spin it however you want, but that's what those words mean.

I really wanted to tip my waitress yesterday. Wow.
 
Fish, what you're saying isn't logical. If you're saying that hunting is senseless killing, you're essentially saying that you're against it. You can spin it however you want, but that's what those words mean.
I also think synchronizing is a senseless way to dive. I'm against it.

I think its senseless to watch baseball. I'm against it.

I think the opera is senseless. I'm against it.

I don't really understand this pokemon game and think its senseless. I'm against it.

I think its senseless that you are trying to paint me in a certain way for no reason and it's apparently important for you to do so and I don't understand why.
I'm against it.

Apparently anytime anyone enjoys doing something that you don't enjoy doing or understand the sense of then you are against it.


Good to know.
 
JJT being a clown.

Fish is just saying he doesnt want to be the one killing/hunting, but doesnt mind if others do it. Is that hard to comprehend?

It's kind of like saying if you arent down to take some dick for anal sex, you are against gay people. (JTT's stance on Fish's opinion that is).
 
JJT being a clown.

Fish is just saying he doesnt want to be the one killing/hunting, but doesnt mind if others do it. Is that hard to comprehend?

It's kind of like saying if you arent down to take some dick for anal sex, you are against gay people.
Exactly.
 
Hantlers thinks Fish' opinion is senseless. He's against it.
I think Hantlers being against Fish' opinion is senseless. I'm against it.
 
Because Hantlers is against fish' opinion and is against it, it means Hantlers doesn't like Fish and wishes he was dead.

That's just wrong.
 
To throw hantlers a bone he is right a little bit. I am against some senseless killing.

If my dog were sitting out on my lawn and someone drove by and shot and killed him then I would be against that.

I'm think that the terrorist attack on 9-11 was senseless killing and I'm against that for sure.

If I'm chilling in a camground and a baby bird that is trying learn how to fly is on the ground hopping and fapping it's wings in an attempt to fly and someone just walks over and stomps on its head then I would be against that senseless killing.

If someone were to kill a deer or elk or whatever by catching and setting it on fire or torturing it for a few hours before killing it then I would be against that.

But..... If someone buys a licence and goes hunting and kills a duck/deer/pheasant/grouse/pronghorn/etc in a quick humane way and there are plenty of that animal left in the wild then I have no problem with that.

Not something that I would enjoy doing but to each their own.
 
What about the guns? Did they build those guns? If they are real hunters they should carve a bow out of wood from a tree they chopped down while using their own pubic hair to weave a bow string. Only then can they be true hunters.

Hey! Look who it is following me around again! Good boy, Gumby. Go get me my newspaper.
 
Has anybody authored a post to counterpoint the idea that only hunters are true preservationists yet? Or are y'all just plowing ahead with that special, isolated Utah-Nevada politics?
 
Let's be honest... Most of us see a difference between hunting an elk and hunting a giraffe.

yeah I dunno how this has been lost in the thread.

If nobody hunted in Montana, we would be overrun with animals. They'd be chock full of nasty diseases and die pretty awfully. I don't like that. Like it or not, we need hunters to manage population.

link? I don't know much on the subject but this is a pretty strong claim that could use some bolstering.
 
It's a hyperbole, but there would be problems.

Hunting does have functionality and I'm totally fine with those who hunt according to mandated regulations regarding that given species. I'm not arguing against that. Tons of hunting that goes down in Alberta.
 
Back
Top