Fainting Hillary
- Thread starter Elizah Huge
- Start date
Miggs
Well-Known Member
Of what financial reasons do you speak?
It cost a lot of ****ing money to build one.
RJF
Well-Known Member
The FED will just print more money like they usually do.
uhhhhmmmm. . . .
This fascination with your dumps could be extensively psychoanalyzed. . . .
nahhhh. . . .If you had something intelligent to say maybe I'd begin to think you're not just taking a dump on this site.
So we have Red, Game, and Jonah who obviously agree with you on some political issues, and all of you are taking a very characteristic point of view that comes off as something unoriginal, and all you can say about Trump is he seems to look like some kind of dictator you don't like, while you have no problem with a fascist world as it now is.
OK. Get back to your self-congratulatory admiration of yourselves and your excrement.
It won't work.
It will have a negative impact on the native wildlife.
It'll be a symbol of stupidity
It'll completely ruin the view
I see Trump the same way you do bruh. I recognize that he's putting on an act. And don't judge my dumps before you see them. In fact, I'm feeling one coming as we speak. Will be sure to send you a picture (in 4k).
Joe Bagadonuts
Well-Known Member
Obama wants me to tell you that you're better than this.
Nah. Don't believe it.
Joe Bagadonuts
Well-Known Member
There was a video on YouTube a while ago with Trump speaking in about 1996, saying that if he ever runs for President he'll run as a Republican because Republicans will believe anything. . . .
Yes, he is an Actor of some skill, but I think it's a mistake to dismiss him as anything but a capable manager. If he had a good chat with Hillary and laughed at her plea to please run for Pres as a Republican or Independent like Perot did for Bill, and said he'd do it, Hillary was mistaken if she thought he wouldn't run to win.
As for charm, I think it can hardly be overstated how important his financial independence has played in this whole thing. It's the reason he could say stuff he knew would suck the Media into his game while winning a lot of cheers from the little folks as well. Americans like people who talk boldly and recklessly, if they can maintain a sort of down-home good ol boy manner about it all. And yes, they'll still love him tomorrow when he says the opposite thing just as boldly. Just being an independent man with no strings attached, that we can see, wins him a lot of support.
As I say, I don't think it's just stupid stuff he does, I think he does it on purpose, and I think he knows how to play it in a bigger picture. So down the stretch he knows how to be the most reasonable candidate just as well. He had to get that malcontent vote to break through the Republican primaries. He has to get the stable center voters to win in the general. Watch him.
He'll do it. Amazing.
But I am sure he will be a "team player" President working with establishment Dems and Reps to get stuff done. He will listen to other people and do what it takes to get their support when necessary. For stuff that people give him enough support on, he'll change the whole table.
He's not locked on an ideology. He's looking at the people in front of him, and understanding them pretty good.
UGLI baby
Well-Known Member
UGLI baby
Well-Known Member
So if the wall would work would you want to build it?
Do you feel strongly about everything that harms wildlife?
How do you feel it's a symbol of stupidity?
This last point I cannot argue with
Joe Bagadonuts
Well-Known Member
I'm pretty sure the video you are referring to does not exist. If it did the Clinton campaign would have showed it to each one of us a billion times by now. There are claims he said the sorts of things you are saying in magazine articles, but so far they have all been debunked.
And, that is the beauty of it.
Surely this is clear to a lot of Washington lobbyists, perhaps those employed by concrete manufacturers, steel and wire fabricators, and union leaders. And how can our legislators or President really resist another spending program a lot of people insist on?
Such persuasions clearly direct our governance wholesale.
I could not possibly know if it was fabricated somehow, and I was not there when he said anything like that myself. Beyond that, I don't doubt he thinks that way.
Joe Bagadonuts
Well-Known Member
If it was on YouTube like you say then it would still be there. It's not like someone is going to protect it as copyrighted material. Can you provide a link?
No, if the wall would "work" I wouldn't want to build it. I have said many times I'm in favor of immigration policy reform that would greatly speed up the immigration process and let in pretty much any law abiding person who wants to enter the U.S.. So I think a wall is a dumb way to solve what is not much of a problem in the first place. The only reason I can see for supporting a wall is because you want to keep the "brown walkers" out.
I'm certainly not super passionate about protecting wildlife, but I'm in favor of not harming ecosystems if there isn't anything significant to be gained.
It's a symbol of stupidity because walls represent division and defensiveness. As if we are afraid of what's on the other side of that wall. And walls were good fortifications about 1000 years ago, in 2016 they are easily defeated in about a dozen different ways. The Great Wall of China was a waste of resources even then. The Berlin Wall was a means to imprison people. Walls represent fear and a need for a false sense of security or just outright oppression or imprisonment. No thanks on a wall.
UGLI baby
Well-Known Member
No, if the wall would "work" I wouldn't want to build it. I have said many times I'm in favor of immigration policy reform that would greatly speed up the immigration process and let in pretty much any law abiding person who wants to enter the U.S.. So I think a wall is a dumb way to solve what is not much of a problem in the first place. The only reason I can see for supporting a wall is because you want to keep the "brown walkers" out.
I'm certainly not super passionate about protecting wildlife, but I'm in favor of not harming ecosystems if there isn't anything significant to be gained.
It's a symbol of stupidity because walls represent division and defensiveness. As if we are afraid of what's on the other side of that wall. And walls were good fortifications about 1000 years ago, in 2016 they are easily defeated in about a dozen different ways. The Great Wall of China was a waste of resources even then. The Berlin Wall was a means to imprison people. Walls represent fear and a need for a false sense of security or just outright oppression or imprisonment. No thanks on a wall.
Cool, all legit answers IMO.
I had just never heard why people are so against building a wall (besides the fact it's expensive/maybe not possible)
I don't think a wall gets built no matter who is president.
I went to look. Found some fun stuff like David Letterman appearances and such. I think it was 1996 or 2000 or 2004 when someone like Letterman was just chattering with him, and as I recall, it appeared and sounded right for a Trumpism. He was, I think, insulting Republicans for being stupid chumps who didn't know how to solve problems or make valid decisions or judgments, probably out of disappointment. Come to think of it, it was probably something he said when the Republicans were caving and buying into Obamacare.
Trump says stuff like that. He just does. Nobody knows how much to make of it. There might have been something in the immediate context that would embarrass the Dems even more.
I'll look some more.