What's new
By:

Paris under attack

Gameface said:
fc83ch054-01_xlg.jpg
Click to expand...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXnkFd373T4
 
magic said:
If most Canadians think like dalamon, then they should take on all of the Syrian refugees that the US is planned to take on. On top of that they should specifically make dalamon host Syrian men who are single.
Click to expand...

Canada has promised to take in 25000 by February. How many is America bringing in again? In a nation with a population ten times higher than Canada?
 
Looks like MVP's home city is bringing some in, while Edmonton is being spared for the time being. Heh.
 
Interesting Daily Beast piece on Putin's bad day at the office.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/11/24/putin-s-very-bad-day-in-syria.html

"Still more embarrassing is the investigative spadework done several months ago by Russia’s still-relatively independent newspaper Novaya Gazeta, showing that Putin’s domestic intelligence arm, the Federal Security Service, has been sending jihadists in Dagestan into Syria so that they might join ISIS, al-Nusra and other franchises, the easier for them to blow stuff up over there than over here."
 
dalamon said:
Canada has promised to take in 25000 by February. How many is America bringing in again? In a nation with a population ten times higher than Canada?
Click to expand...
So usa population is ten times higher than Canada and that's a reason to take in more people? Sounds like canada has more room.
 
fishonjazz said:
So usa population is ten times higher than Canada and that's a reason to take in more people? Sounds like canada has more room.
Click to expand...

Uh, it is about effect on economy and burden on welfare system. Both depend on size of population supporting them. It has nothing to do with availability of physical space. ROFL.
 
fishonjazz said:
So usa population is ten times higher than Canada and that's a reason to take in more people? Sounds like canada has more room.
Click to expand...
The US has 85 people per square mile and Canada has 8.5 per square mile, so you are right. Canada is not pulling their weight. Of course, Macau has 48,000 people per square mile, so we all have a long way to go to catch them.

I also learned that Utah has the lowest population density of any state that has an American pro sports team (football, baseball, basketball)at 35 per square mile.
 
Siro said:
Uh, it is about effect on economy and burden on welfare system. Both depend on size of population supporting them. It has nothing to do with availability of physical space. ROFL.
Click to expand...
He mentioned nothing about welfare or economy in the post I quoted so kindly stfu.
 
fishonjazz said:
He mentioned nothing about welfare or economy in the post I quoted so kindly stfu.
Click to expand...

Countries with bigger population can take on more refuges with a lesser impact. He doesn't have to mention the economy, the point is obvious.
 
Siro said:
Countries with bigger population can take on more refuges with a lesser impact. He doesn't have to mention the economy, the point is obvious.
Click to expand...
Then China should take them all
 
Siro said:
China is still a developing country. Their average citizen is still a bit on the poor side. Japan should take some, but they're xenophobic as ****.
Click to expand...

my god, you and your infinite qualifiers. you should take on all the refugees.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top