What's new

So I want to talk about the Mormons

I have never told you what the cause of your persecution really was. I haven't told you how you need to change to reduce persecution. I haven't tried to blame you for others persecuting you and made you responsible for not impinging on their sensibilities with your religion. I never said you wouldn't have been beaten if you just tried harder. I didn't use pretend that the history of persecution of Mormons was unimportant to today. Instead, when you talked about how you were treated, I listened and accepted that the people in the wrong where the abusers.



I am still holding out hope for you.

And yet you lessened my view point because I am not black. Regardless of how I was treated I am responsible for how I react. If I react in a way that further seperates us then I have some blame as well.
 
Weird how assuming creates misunderstanding.

Or you could post in a way that will not logically lead to these assumptions. If you are not willing to truly explain your point of view beyond some condescending remark then I do not feel guilty for slapping you down.

If you want true discourse and dialouge then perhaps your should contribute to it.
 
If every time you posted you said everything the reader needed to know to comprehend you each post would be a few hundred pages long. We HAVE to make assumptions about what you're talking about. The only way to dispel them is to clear up the one's it's reasonable to assume people will make incorrectly.
Ya, I just wish there was a way to find out about a point of view instead of the guessing game we all have to play. Oh wait, there is a way. It's called asking questions instead of assmegging the whole thread up with your assumptions.
 
Ya, I just wish there was a way to find out about a point of view instead of the guessing game we all have to play. Oh wait, there is a way. It's called asking questions instead of assmegging the whole thread up with your assumptions.

Heaven forbid you act like anything other then some self righteous clown. The majority of people here were providing honest discussion. You failed to, not the rest of us.
 
Ya, I just wish there was a way to find out about a point of view instead of the guessing game we all have to play. Oh wait, there is a way. It's called asking questions instead of assmegging the whole thread up with your assumptions.

Okay, let's try it then.

When you said "Ya" did you really mean "yes" or "yeah"

When you said "wish" you meant that figuratively, right? You didn't actually perform some act that constitutes a wish?

What guessing game do we all have to play? I wasn't invited...

What's "assmegging?"

Are you referring to assumptions I made? Which ones?

This is good. I was tired of assmegging up everything. I't s gonna take a lot longer and be far less enjoyable, but at least I won't have to call upon my life experiences and knowledge to understand what people are saying, I'll just ask them.
 
Which of these do not have equivalents in the King James Bible?

From what I could tell via some searching just now, most are found in the King James as well. Not too surprising, since the KJV is also translated from Hebrew (Old Testament, anyway). You're probably implying that Joseph Smith could have incorporated them all simply by imitating the style of the KIV. Seems rather unlikely to me, particularly since some of them weren't even known/recognized in Joseph's day so he would have had to do it subconsciously. Possible, but highly unlikely to be doable by someone who "could neither write nor dictate a coherent and well-worded letter" (his wife's words).

Why would some of them (such as "women" instead of "wives") appear sporadically?

Presumably because some times Joseph translated the words more literally than others.
 
And yet you lessened my view point because I am not black.

Regarding religion, you have been on one side of the power dynamic, regarding race, you have been on the other side. Being a white Mormon is a very different experience from being a black Protestant. Also, I don't think of your point of view as lesser, just surrounded by the privilege that you refuse to acknowledge in degree and effect.

Regardless of how I was treated I am responsible for how I react. If I react in a way that further seperates us then I have some blame as well.

When people were checking your head for horns, would it have helped if you said the LDS were Christians just like they were?
 
From what I could tell via some searching just now, most are found in the King James as well. Not too surprising, since the KJV is also translated from Hebrew (Old Testament, anyway). You're probably implying that Joseph Smith could have incorporated them all simply by imitating the style of the KIV. Seems rather unlikely to me, particularly since some of them weren't even known/recognized in Joseph's day so he would have had to do it subconsciously. Possible, but highly unlikely to be doable by someone who "could neither write nor dictate a coherent and well-worded letter" (his wife's words).

My understanding is the KJV would have been the Bible of the churches Smith attended. Even preachers tend to sound like the Bible they read from during sermons, more than they do in casual conversation. Just like in any other field, we hear a certain vocabulary and style in a certain context, and emulate it there. Occasionally, I even notice that I talk differently on buses, while teaching, while working, while gaming, etc. It wouldn't need to be "doable", it would be automatic.

Presumably because some times Joseph translated the words more literally than others.

I thought the translations were being provided supernaturally?
 
Regarding religion, you have been on one side of the power dynamic, regarding race, you have been on the other side. Being a white Mormon is a very different experience from being a black Protestant. Also, I don't think of your point of view as lesser, just surrounded by the privilege that you refuse to acknowledge in degree and effect.



When people were checking your head for horns, would it have helped if you said the LDS were Christians just like they were?

In one or two cases it lead to a discussion which in turn lead to friendship. So yes it did. Regardless of their actions i am still responsible for mine. I can either act as I know I should in an effort to bridge the gap or I can let their actions dictate my own and reinforce the divide they wish to create.

Edit: I (see: immediate family) ended up converting three of the girls in my high school.
 
Regarding religion, you have been on one side of the power dynamic, regarding race, you have been on the other side. Being a white Mormon is a very different experience from being a black Protestant. Also, I don't think of your point of view as lesser, just surrounded by the privilege that you refuse to acknowledge in degree and effect.



When people were checking your head for horns, would it have helped if you said the LDS were Christians just like they were?

On Race and Religion I have been on opposing sides most of the time and yet my stance is consistent on both.
 
Since when do you believe that Mormons have some fort of insight on the persecution faced by Mormons? Maybe if you just dropped the name "Mormon", and called yourself "Christian", everything would better, and you wouldn't face so much persecution. [/sarcasm]

The Church of JESUS CHRIST of Latter-day Saints.

*shakes head*
 
In one or two cases it lead to a discussion which in turn lead to friendship. So yes it did. Regardless of their actions i am still responsible for mine. I can either act as I know I should in an effort to bridge the gap or I can let their actions dictate my own and reinforce the divide they wish to create.

Edit: I (see: immediate family) ended up converting three of the girls in my high school.

Identifying as an African American hasn't prevented any friendships that I'm aware of, nor stopped any inter-racial relationships.
 
So because you have not seen it means it does not exist?

I'm open to hearing stories about it. Are you saying that you refuse to be friends with anyone who says they are "African American", as opposed to "black"?
 
My understanding is the KJV would have been the Bible of the churches Smith attended. Even preachers tend to sound like the Bible they read from during sermons, more than they do in casual conversation. Just like in any other field, we hear a certain vocabulary and style in a certain context, and emulate it there. Occasionally, I even notice that I talk differently on buses, while teaching, while working, while gaming, etc. It wouldn't need to be "doable", it would be automatic.

Perhaps you can point to some other early 19th century American works that display this same amount of Hebraisms, then?

I thought the translations were being provided supernaturally?

Certainly. But that doesn't mean Joseph Smith had nothing to do with the process. You should read about how Oliver Cowdery tried to translate, for example.
 
So, you will no longer say you're a Mormon?

I wont make a promise I can't keep. I'm human and will mess up.

Having said that, Even as a member of the LDS faith I can see that seperating ourselves as Mormons does us no favors. Just as other politically correct terms do others no favors. But then again that was always my stance.

I do find it funny that you are attempting to use the arguement I have made before agaisnt me. It is a foolish tactic since you are arguing for what I have been saying. So how can you be arguing against me?
 
I'm open to hearing stories about it. Are you saying that you refuse to be friends with anyone who says they are "African American", as opposed to "black"?

Did I say that? But when I encounter someone that tells me they are African American I tell them I am European American and they look at me like I have lost my mind. I just smile and watch as you can see them thinking about it.

It is a nonsense foolish term that has one purpose. To seperate. That is the problem. People want to focus to much on what seperates us. Skin tone, religion, political views...all crap and hogwash.

Racism (one example of many) will never go away because society wants to embrace that divide. That is why we have stupid terms like that. All it does is contribute to the divide. Just one more brick on that wall between us.
 
Back
Top