You baited yourself with the "moral argument" line. I just loled.
And how is that one sided debate going for you? lol
You baited yourself with the "moral argument" line. I just loled.
Just saying that they are not as easy to make. Not as easy to carry and deliver. And not addictive.There are plenty that do know how to make guns. Also carrying and concealing a firearm is extremely easy. Not all guns are 12 gauge shotguns.
Just saying that they are not as easy to make. Not as easy to carry and deliver. And not addictive.
The drug black market is, and would be, bigger and more successful than the gun black market simply because it's easier and, due to addiction, in higher demand.
For those reasons I don't think comparing the legality of guns vs drugs is apples to apples
Just saying that they are not as easy to make. Not as easy to carry and deliver. And not addictive.
The drug black market is, and would be, bigger and more successful than the gun black market simply because it's easier and, due to addiction, in higher demand.
For those reasons I don't think comparing the legality of guns vs drugs is apples to apples
But is hard to distribute guns. I mean with drugs I could literally carry hundreds of packages for customers and it's very affordable for them.I am not trying to compare a black market for guns in size to a black market for drugs. My point is that outlawing it will not stop the demand. Even if the motivation for that demand is different like it would be for drugs and guns.
Also "not as easy" does not mean hard. It is like saying super, extremely, very easy to super, very easy.
But is hard to distribute guns. I mean with drugs I could literally carry hundreds of packages for customers and it's very affordable for them.
You cant just walk around hundreds of affordable guns for your customers.
They are simply very very different. I think this gun black market after a ban is easy overblown and somewhat of a myth.
Perhaps we should work on changing that thinking before we go out and ban something. Otherwise lets go and ban everything that can be harmful towards humans.
Now I own a lot of guns. I enjoy them, I think they're fun. They definitely have uses. I would be opposed to a ban, but I do think we need to increase education on guns. We have required classes on sex, drugs, alcohol...why don't we do the same with guns? Why is that so unrealistic? We have a large amount of people spewing out rhetoric on a subject they know practically nothing about.
Of course they're not identical, but the core issue is the same. Banning them won't get rid of them. These people will still get guns, and they'll still use them, we just won't have law obeying citizens with them.
Why can't we do both simultaneously? Ban guns and educate people on why they're ruining the society.
Would this education start with the principle that guns are a bad thing? For all of us? Because if it doesn't, it's a waste of time. As long as people believe that guns are fun, like you do, these sort of situations will happen. If you're going to talk to kids about this kind of stuff, the way to go would be peace education. Violence IS wrong, even when it's necessary. It's still wrong. Guns are not cool, nor fun, nor is killing people or animals.
I really don't understand how anyone could live in a society where guns and violence are celebrated as cool and manly and then be shocked when someone really takes this to heart.
All the time is a huge over exaggeration.I don't and thankfully I doubt we will ever find out. I do not think guns are hard to distribute. It is already happening under the table all the time.
All the time is a huge over exaggeration.
I have lived a somewhat seedy life and been around allot of criminal activity.
I have yet to ever meet someone selling guns on the black market and I have yet to meet someone who bought a gun on the black market.
I have known a few people (friends allot of the time) who have robbed stores, and shot people. They got their guns from parents or purchased them legally.
Yet I have met literally hundreds of people who have purchased drugs and know many drug dealers. I have done both things myself.
They are so different that there really is no comparison
The Revolution?
At least there would be less law abiding citizens shooting each other though. It's not like all shootings are done by criminals who purchased guns illegally. In fact I would bet that the majority of people getting shot by guns are from guns purchased legally. Law abiding citizens who got pissed when they were layed off work, wife cheated on them, got cut off in traffic, gun went off accidentally, hunting mishap, mental stability changed, etc etc.
Or someone stole a law abiding citizens gun and used it.
I have a feeling that the number of shootings by people who got their guns on the black market is quite small
Apparently The Revolution was a mistake as it is the event that secured American's freedom to bear arms. Those silly founding fathers.
Ya I bet the number is extremely high.I suspect that >95% of the guns in this country were originally purchased legally.
I'm enjoying your input in this thread.
I do think there's a lot of evidence to suggest that drug running, gun running, and human trafficking are linked. The big criminal syndicates diversify by trying to get into the mix in all three. The best way to strangle these syndicates would be to legalize drugs and crash their cash flow. Use that as an end-around to exposing the linkages in the firearm trade and bringing it down. Do that at the same time as you make buying a gun, in whatever legal fashion, harder to do (more background checks, taxes, etc.).