Lebron took Mike Brown to the finals.
20-25 or whatever the sticklers came up with is close enough to .500.
Someone mentioned they are on pace for 36 & 46 if they had a point guard all season. 36 wins is HUGE outperformance, especially since the Jazz have had the league's toughest schedule all season. Give an average NBA schedule and they're clearly a .500+ team.
Pretty hard to deny Ty's hand in the magic of 36 wins. The guy can't do anything to win with those who've hated him from the start.
It's 20-28 with Trey, I believe. Not close.
Most people throw out his first three games off injury, first two at minimum. It's a meager difference anyway -- 42% or 44%. Either one is nearly double outperformance than what was expected of Ty and his squad this season. I doubt many other coaches could have gotten this squad up to a 44% win rate. Maybe five other coaches is all.
Since games which include injuries magically don't count, it's only fair to return the favor and remove the following:
win vs. Phoenix (Bledsoe, Okafor, Barbosa)
win vs. Lakers (Kobe, Gasol, Young, Farmar)
win vs. Kings (Cousins, Gay)
win vs. Nuggets (Miller, Galinari, McGee, Robinson)
win vs. OKC (Ibaka)
Continuing that correction and applying it to all of the Jazz' games, I've got them with a record of 3 wins and 6 losses overall this season in "real" games. That's about 33%, which is close to 42-44%, which -- by this point -- we all know is essentially 50%. And since numbers within 6 to 8 percent of each other are basically the same, let's just call it what it is and say that the Jazz are -- for all intents and purposes -- a .580 team. That's good enough for 3rd place (in the East).
Please, anyone with the balls to step up and say they predicted before this season that the Jazz would be in 3rd place in March, go ahead and do so. And I'll call you a liar.
Suck it, haters.
But you're not acknowledging that the wins were piling up during the easiest part of our schedule, and when we played teams that were missing their stars. Because we had the hardest schedule to start, it was inevitable that it slowed way down--and that's when we got healthy and got hot.
We're not close to a .500 team this year, no matter how thick your rose-colored glasses are.
Since games which include injuries magically don't count, it's only fair to return the favor and remove the following:
win vs. Phoenix (Bledsoe, Okafor, Barbosa)
win vs. Lakers (Kobe, Gasol, Young, Farmar)
win vs. Kings (Cousins, Gay)
win vs. Nuggets (Miller, Galinari, McGee, Robinson)
win vs. OKC (Ibaka)
Continuing that correction and applying it to all of the Jazz' games, I've got them with a record of 3 wins and 6 losses overall this season in "real" games. That's about 33%, which is close to 42-44%, which -- by this point -- we all know is essentially 50%. And since numbers within 6 to 8 percent of each other are basically the same, let's just call it what it is and say that the Jazz are -- for all intents and purposes -- a .580 team. That's good enough for 3rd place (in the East).
Please, anyone with the balls to step up and say they predicted before this season that the Jazz would be in 3rd place in March, go ahead and do so. And I'll call you a liar.
Suck it, haters.
Well, by franklin's logic, Utah has two NBA championships (c'mon, we were close enough).
Ty has also led Utah to the playoffs the last three seasons (close enough). After all, when Sloan stepped down, Jazz were in playoff position. Not his fault the team finished poorly - so give Ty credit for the playoffs that season (close enough). And it certainly isn't Ty's fault that a veteran-laden team last year finished 12-12 in the months of March/April. Jazz were "close enough." After all, the goal in this league is to finish .500. It's those mean teams that had better records than Utah did in the Western Conference. All Utah needs to do is have a coach that can give them a .500 record and some day the rest of the league will come down to that level.
It's hilarious that 20-25 or however you want to spin this is "close enough" to .500. By all means give franklin's brother/uncle or whatever the relation a hefty new contract. Let's get "close enough" to .500 every year. And maybe the 3-yr decline in attendance can be adjusted by the people who were "close enough" to the ESA but didn't enter the building.
I kind of get the argument. Take away the 1-14 start and the Jazz are 20-25. Stretch that over the entire season and it's still just 36-46. Injuries? Every team deals with them. I'm too lazy to look it up, but deduct for those 15 games and I'll bet the Jazz don't have an alarming number of games missed to injuries.
The other caveat is that you can't entirely dismiss the 1-14 start. It was a BRUTAL schedule with more away games than home, and a very tough SOS. Even with Burke, Evans and Williams all healthy from Day 1, I'd suggest the record may only have improved 3-5 games.
So let's be generous and give the Jazz 5 more wins over that stretch. They're now 26-34 with a winning % of .433. That translates to a 35-47 record.
Would 35-36 wins be overachieving with this squad? Remember, in both scenarios we've completely removed the effects of having Harris, Tinsley and Lucas in the lineup.
Blaming Ty for the Jazz losing after blowing up the team mid-season is possibly the most illogical thing I've read here.
I called 34 wins before the season started. Looks like I had more faith in Ty than most.
Nobody had the Jazz playing .500 basketball this year. Ty is a big part of this clear outperformance, but like Sloan he'll never receive recognition for winning more than seems possible.