The "why" in the movie is worse than its "how". I have a generally low opinion of sci-fi movies and TV shows, probably because I've been spoiled by the high level that can be found in literature. What it boils down to is this: a man creates the most significant tech advance in human history, and what does he do with it? Personal sex slaves. Why? Because of some flimsy excuse of him wanting to make sure it's "just right" before releasing it. The result is your typical crappy sci-fi thriller than doesn't offer much to contemplate. In a way, I understand this. The mainstream just isn't ready for real philosophy in their science fiction. There are science fiction movies that do a good job tackling social issues (like District 9). But I can't think of a single movie that does the philosophy of science any justice.
Do you read science fiction? If so, you should look into the work of Greg Egan. The existential and ontological questions he raises are soul-shattering. Easily my most beloved author.
From Wikipedia:
