RandyForRubio
Well-Known Member
We'll start here.
If you'll recall, I came into the league at more than the halfway point. Upon entering, I think I lost maybe two matchups until the playoffs started? I certainly remember beating your team. [MENTION=848]dalamon[/MENTION] can confirm this. I also remember you asking me to take your spot in the playoffs because you thought I had the better team. I declined. You went on to win the championship. You're welcome. I also recall that I already brought this up to you, but for some reason when I did, you decided that you had nothing more to say to me. Funny how that happens (that's sarcasm in case you're still trying to read tone...so is this).
As for the #spywins, the majority of people realized that I was making a joke. So no, it doesn't take a genius to decipher what I tried to do there. Go back to the thread. You, and maybe two other people thought that the hashtag meant it was intentional. Everybody else recognized it as a joke.
I made another post, the one asking you to start a new thread so we didn't clutter up the draft thread, right after I posted because I had forgotten to do it and was trying to get it in before your response. I don't see where the repetitiveness would be a problem here, but if you would like to explain it, I'm more than willing to listen. I just don't understand how two posts in the span of 7 minutes is enough to trigger you.
Ok, so here we need some context. Here's the post I'm referring to above: Quote Originally Posted by JustTheTip View Post
Hey [MENTION=631]ONE LOVE[/MENTION], why don't you start a new thread with your response to this so we don't clutter up the draft thread. Thanks.
And I really do think if you're going to accuse me of all of this, you do need to give examples.
Here is your response.
In what world is asking you to start a new thread so we don't clutter up the draft thread condescending? Maybe it's a language barrier? I don't know. But honestly, I can't think of anybody who would find that condescending. Honestly, if somebody else thought that was condescending, let me know. It was not my intention.
Ok. Lets talk about where this started. Fish said that a certain player was a great/good (I don't remember tbh) pick. I responded with: "Said player had a 35%/35% shooting split. Great pick?" Fish then told me to stop talking to him as my negativity was bothering him. I'm rather confused as to how me disagreeing with somebody is labeled as negativity, but whatever. I don't see how what I said was not nice. I simply disagreed. Disagreeing /=/ personal attack. Please realize this.
As for the repetitiveness, typically somebody will disagree with me or I'll disagree with them, and then we discuss from there. They'll respond, I'll respond back. I'll respond, they'll respond back. That's how conversations work, usually. Am I just not supposed to reply? Should I not be allowed to voice my opinion because disagreeing with you hurts your feelings? I've asked you to give me examples of what I've done wrong, and so far I've been told that I'm a nasty person because I made a bad/stupid trade, I've been told that I'm condescending because I asked you to start a new thread for this, and I've been told that I'm not nice because I'm repetitive. But here's the funny thing! This whole time, you, and fish, have been the ones insulting me while I've never said a bad thing about you. But I'm the nasty one here? C'mon.
Yes, I disagree with people a lot. I'm opinionated. I also agree with people a lot here. I compliment people a lot here. So for you to only concentrate on when I disagree seems to show a willful bias towards what I'm saying. You think that I'm mean because you want me to be mean, because you view disagreeing with somebody as a personal affront.
I'm posting this here, because I'd like to discuss this with you, out in the open. You and Fish. If other people agree with you two, I'd like to hear it as well. I'm not above admitting I'm wrong. I'm not above changing. I just think that all of this, my thread here included, is all ridiculous.
