While I don't think Belll should be in a Jazz uniform next season (and think it was a mistake to sign him again at all), wasting a one-time only amnesty on an expiring $3m salary doesn't make sense and seems like a waster. Would make much more sense to just waive him or trade him for a future pick or a Euro that will never come over.
Bell to be Amnestied
- Thread starter mellow
- Start date
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
KOC, please trade him for the rights to Emir Preldzic. Thank you.
margodydek
Well-Known Member
Do people realize that after next season, the only players that we'll be able to amnesty are Hayward and Favors?
Stifle Tower
Punch Bowl Re-Filler
Well, if no one waited to report something until it was truly a "sure thing" we'd get all our information from ESPN, like we did with the Deron deal. Nothing is a LOCKE (pun intended) even when it goes to the league office (case in point the original trades submitted involving Gasol and CP3). The NBA has the ability to reject or make teams redo a trade.
Locke is probably as reliable as any other source out there. And what makes his job doubly hard are the tight lips in the Jazz FO. KOC is hands-down the most secretive GM in the league. And I have a TON of respect for Kevin becuase of that. It's frustrating as a fan, but I don't think deals should be disclosed until there's been an agreement in principal between the teams. And KOC even had the chutzpah to get PO'd with Greg over Miller's disclosure of the Jefferson deal before it was finalized. You gotta love that, baby!
JJ Rage
Active Member
Exactly this. Even if the current plan is to amnesty Bell, KOC is not going to do it until they've exhausted all possible trade scenarios. He sure as hell not going to publicly talk about it.
mellow
Well-Known Member
Sarcasm? They have bold, italics and underline, when will somebody invent a sarcasm style?
NAOS
Well-Known Member
He has been the sole Bell apologist
When you go to work, and one of your coworkers is knowingly talking to your boss and asking why you are getting certain jobs and saying he/she should be getting them... but is nice to you to your face... how would your work "locker room" be? Would there be some tension or some negative feelings in there?
I would think there would be, whether you talk about it or not. If somebody is trying to take time or work away from me, and they are clearly not better than I am I would not like it even a little bit.
You don't have to see it to know it's there, there are signs. Him whining to the media, his sneaky little comments to the media about things. His statements about the coach and the intentions behind them. His saying things about being very willing to be traded.
You have to pay better attention Cyrone if you don't think Raja is not at least a distraction in the locker room. There is talking like a professional, and then there is being a professional. Raja talks the talk (appearance), but I don't think he walks the walk.
/2cents
theNBAnerd
Well-Known Member
bell has definitely been a distraction.
and i honestly expected the amnesty news at some point. as others have pointed out, the other expiring contracts at least have some trade value, both now and into the season. bell is someone the jazz have to be rid of before the start of camp.
that said, i'd be surprised if they used the amnesty clause on him NOW. there's a lot of offseason left and, even though i doubt anybody is interested in paying bell 3.3M, you might as well keep that card in your hand and only discard it when you have to. maybe when teams start striking out on their plan A, B and C guys you have someone willing to give you a second. or maybe you have a trade and the numbers don't quite work out so you need a little bit of a throw-in. or if those things don't happen, THEN you amensty his ***, but you lose absolutely nothing by waiting until later in the offseason to do it.
and i honestly expected the amnesty news at some point. as others have pointed out, the other expiring contracts at least have some trade value, both now and into the season. bell is someone the jazz have to be rid of before the start of camp.
that said, i'd be surprised if they used the amnesty clause on him NOW. there's a lot of offseason left and, even though i doubt anybody is interested in paying bell 3.3M, you might as well keep that card in your hand and only discard it when you have to. maybe when teams start striking out on their plan A, B and C guys you have someone willing to give you a second. or maybe you have a trade and the numbers don't quite work out so you need a little bit of a throw-in. or if those things don't happen, THEN you amensty his ***, but you lose absolutely nothing by waiting until later in the offseason to do it.
I agree with all of that.
From what I understand Raja is completely on board with the young guys playing, he was just upset because he never felt like Ty communicated it with him clearly what his role would be and just cold shouldered him. I don't think Raja takes it out on his teammates, because many of them have said what influence he has on them (watch Burks try to play defense like Bell by getting up in opponents). It's more of a Worker/Boss conflict than it seems to be a Worker/Worker conflict (which is what your analogy sounded like).
By the way, I'm all for amnestying Bell. I will be surprised if the Jazz do it though.