Then DL could say "see ya later" because Dante is ready to be the starter.
Andy Bailey? That dude loves Exum.I wouldnt be surprised if you were Andy B tbh. The only two people who cant bring themselves to give the kid any praise.
Are you trying to tell us that Dante plays with himself? What's your source on this?My personal hope is that Rubio is willing to take a bench role in the future.. Dante/Donovan/Exum all play together right now anyway, and that lineup seems to do pretty well.
Kid Flash? That fits Donovan better than Exum. X Factor, or X for short. Can't get much better than that.I like that nickname
With an offensive rating of 127 and a PER of 23.9. Both of which are the best on our team. Although just barely, Gobert is at 124 offensive rating and 20.9 PER.
Exum's PER would be 9th in the NBA if he qualified. Exum's Offensive rating would be #2 in the league.
Those are according to basketball reference. NBA.com are different. Here are the Jazz advanced stats on NBA.com. Exum is leading in just about everything (besides the 1/2 minute of play from Naz)
http://stats.nba.com/players/advanced/?sort=OFF_RATING&dir=-1&Season=2017-18&SeasonType=Regular Season&TeamID=1610612762
NBA.com advanced defensive stats show great things as well.
Those numbers are probably not sustainable but I think it shows how good he has looked in his limited numbers so far.
With an offensive rating of 127 and a PER of 23.9. Both of which are the best on our team. Although just barely, Gobert is at 124 offensive rating and 20.9 PER.
Exum's PER would be 9th in the NBA if he qualified. Exum's Offensive rating would be #2 in the league.
Since you're using OR and PER as two stats to show the value of a player, it should be noted that Ben Simmons' Offensive Rating of 109.1 is better than Donovan Mitchell's of 106.6. His PER of 19.79 is also better than Mitchell's 16.49.
I love it when we point to historically worst PER ever after Exum's first season some people quickly dismiss it as "PER is useless stat". Yet here we see PER used after few games to tell that Exum is great? There is no question kid looks much better - but the sample is very limited. How about we let him have at least 30-40 games and then talk how good or bad he is.
I find stats to be very useful. They are just not the entire story always and circumstances are always different.
In this case I am using that stat for people like you. Who say he was the worst in the nba based on that stat, so obviously now he must be the best on the Jazz by your standard. At least in these games so far.
Rofl. Way to change your narrative.
Jerebko, And Crowder are shooters at the 4.Rubio only has 1 year left. He's having a career year this year and maybe he does the same again next season and then "Hill's" the Jazz. Then DL could say "see ya later" because Dante is ready to be the starter.
Really doesnt matter who starts. All three could get 30 mins in a 3-man rotation. Or you keep them slightly under to create some PT for Royce.
I do think the Jazz need to find a shooter at the 4, though.
I think they can come from a few places. Some from O'neal, some from Rubio and some from Donovan and Ingles. I love Donovan and Ingles but they don't need more than 32-35 minutes per night and lately they have been getting more than that.He needs more minutes... not sure where they come from but I need more Dante.
Who say he was the worst in the nba based on that stat, so obviously now he must be the best on the Jazz by your standard. At least in these games so far.
I don't think we need 40 games to see what is obvious already. He's stronger, more confident, more mature, and definitely better.I love it when we point to historically worst PER ever after Exum's first season some people quickly dismiss it as "PER is useless stat". Yet here we see PER used after few games to tell that Exum is great? There is no question kid looks much better - but the sample is very limited. How about we let him have at least 30-40 games and then talk how good or bad he is.
True. But we comparing whole season with few games. Andrea Bargnani had 13 game stretch in his career where he was posting insane numbers like 30pts/10 reb per game, and 60% FG and 50% 3 pt shooting. Where is he now BTW?
Do you think he is playing poorly right now?
Who is this "we"? You're the one (and the only one) who made a song and dance about his low PER, now it's swung the other way you're the one finding ways to dismiss it.I love it when we point to historically worst PER ever after Exum's first season some people quickly dismiss it as "PER is useless stat". Yet here we see PER used after few games to tell that Exum is great? There is no question kid looks much better - but the sample is very limited. How about we let him have at least 30-40 games and then talk how good or bad he is.
Never has that changed. Please note where I have said one stat is the most meaningful.
Just like in this case, you showed some stats that are positive for Exum and I showed some more stats that were positive for him. I even said I didnt think they were sustainable but showed he is playing pretty well. But I also have thought he has played well before but just inconsistent for a variety of reasons.
Do you think he is not playing well?
Is your best argument for everything ROFL? It is one of your better points.