What's new
By:

I mean..guys..do we have our star?

Is Hayward a bonafide number one option?

  • Total voters
    34
The Blue Elephant said:
If you take into account minutes played Kanter already attempts more shots per game than Hayward.
Click to expand...

That's because as soon as Kanter receives the ball, no matter how much time is remaining on the clock and no matter where on the floor he currently is, he's going to:

A. Shoot immediately.
B. Post-up and then shoot.
C. Drive and then shoot.
D. Turn it over.

As soon as Kanter touches the ball I can predict with 95% accuracy exactly what he's going to do on any given play.
 
Flc said:
That's because as soon as Kanter receives the ball, no matter how much time is remaining on the clock and no matter where on the floor he currently is, he's going to:

A. Shoot immediately.
B. Post-up and then shoot.
C. Drive and then shoot.
D. Turn it over.

As soon as Kanter touches the ball I can predict with 95% accuracy exactly what he's going to do on any given play.
Click to expand...

and your point is?
 
Id also say 1b, in this Snyder system he's no1. Favs no3, agree Burks could be no2 once he's 100%
 
The Blue Elephant said:
If you take into account minutes played Kanter already attempts more shots per game than Hayward. Unless Kanter plays less minutes or start taking less shots he is on pace to be the primary option. If he gets traded or doesn't sign a contract with the Jazz that could be true but no one knows for sure and is a guess at this point. I never necessarily said Kanter will be a good primary option or who I want to be the primary option but posters like Cy really like to insult other posters and it exposes their low self esteem.

EDIT: also checked Derrick Favors and Trey Burkes FGA per 36 and Kanter has more than them as well.
Click to expand...

Lol. Rich coming from your bitchy ***. You said he "gonna" to be our number one option which is just ****ing stupid.
 
seattlejazzfan said:
The problem there is that Gobert was really good last year. The dumbass coach just didn't play him.
Click to expand...

Actually, I see plenty of tools for Dante to make a big leap. He has great feel and timing out of the PnR; he has a quick first step; his three point shot is dependable enough that he can start his offense with it; he shows signs of elite defense; AND this coach is playing him. That's a lot o ****, mayne. Add 15 lbs this offseason and instill a bullishness to get to the rim and you've got the soup for a leap.
 
NAOS said:
Actually, I see plenty of tools for Dante to make a big leap. He has great feel and timing out of the PnR; he has a quick first step; his three point shot is dependable enough that he can start his offense with it; he shows signs of elite defense; AND this coach is playing him. That's a lot o ****, mayne. Add 15 lbs this offseason and instill a bullishness to get to the rim and you've got the soup for a leap.
Click to expand...
Yeah, my point was Gobert didn't really have to make a huge leap to get where he is. No doubt he has improved a ton, but it wasn't a miraculous or even unexpected improvement.

For Dante, I just hope guys have to guard him next year. Maybe get his per to 10 or close to it.
 
seattlejazzfan said:
Yeah, my point was Gobert didn't really have to make a huge leap to get where he is. No doubt he has improved a ton, but it wasn't a miraculous or even unexpected improvement.

For Dante, I just hope guys have to guard him next year. Maybe get his per to 10 or close to it.
Click to expand...

Dude, Rudy became a national phenomenon this year. The board has been stuffed full of homers for him who STILL get shocked by his improvement. I guess you're above that all? saw it as fate? c'mon braugh... get of teh high horse. Rudy was better than the number of minutes he played last year AND he improved remarkably.
 
NAOS said:
Dude, Rudy became a national phenomenon this year. The board has been stuffed full of homers for him who STILL get shocked by his improvement. I guess you're above that all? saw it as fate? c'mon braugh... get of teh high horse. Rudy was better than the number of minutes he played last year AND he improved remarkably.
Click to expand...
Relax, big fella. I too am shocked by how good he is. I mentioned he has improved a ton. But the fact is, when he played last year in his limited minutes, he flat out produced as evidenced by his nearly identical per 36 numbers in terms of rebounding and blocked shots. But again, he has improved a ton as he has been able to keep up those numbers with increased minutes, and his offense made a sizeable leap.

But make no mistake, Rudy was really good and showed a lot of promise last year. Just unfortunate he played for a knucklehead coach.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top