416Klawzz
Well-Known Member
Just tell yourself he is better than big stiff useless Gobert and you will feel betterI'm not sure I get this trade.
Awful contract, and he's just going to be eating into Hendricks development.
Just tell yourself he is better than big stiff useless Gobert and you will feel betterI'm not sure I get this trade.
Awful contract, and he's just going to be eating into Hendricks development.
I’m looking at it simply as the Jazz looking to upgrade Rudy Gay’s minutes this year and maybe rehab John Collins value for a trade later. Not necessarily a move for this year, but a set-up move for down the road.Very interesting.
Not sure I like it, but Utah is going for huge lineups. We matchup amazingly against Denver. Also we are looking to gameplan for Wemby in the future
20-ish... depends on KO and Clarkson.Do either of you know how much cap we have left?
You are stupidHow do we get Bufkin out of this?
What an absolute ****ing catastrophe. Are you ****ing kidding me right now?
Yeah I need something back for this deal. I don't love having a long term contract over top of Hendricks. If we flip him at the deadline or move KO separately for something then okay... just think we gave Atlanta a get out of jail free card.Really? Basically got him for free while getting rid of Gay at the same time.
We didn't get him for free. We got him for $25 million a year for three years. He's neutral to negative in value.Really? Basically got him for free while getting rid of Gay at the same time.
26 to start the season, but good point. Decent rehab valueHe's only 25 and has been pretty healthy. I think he will flourish away from Trae Young.
We shouldn't be sending anything in positive value to eat that money. ****ing unbelievable.Wow! Didn’t see that coming.
Hawks duck the tax.
Jazz add another young big man to their front court - who will likely get flipped in another trade down the road.
And they move off of Rudy Gay’s final year - all for just a future 2nd round pick.
Bruh the Reaves thing wasn't happeningWe didn't get him for free. We got him for $25 million a year for three years. He's neutral to negative in value.
That's also the salary slot for Reaves.
Reaves ain’t happening. You’d have to move real assets to get him now, and even if you did. . . there’s a good chance the Lakers just decide to keep him and match any offer sheet he gets.We didn't get him for free. We got him for $25 million a year for three years. He's neutral to negative in value.
That's also the salary slot for Reaves.