Hopper
Banned
Here's the thing, people are making a false connection between this Muslim center and what happened on 9-11...
Good post, there, eh, Game? I likes dat one.
Here's the thing, people are making a false connection between this Muslim center and what happened on 9-11...
When the reputation process was introduced on this board, I thought I would never bother to use it. You sir, have just earned my very first usage of it. That was a very impressive post. Thank you.
Yup, they need to be more sensible to the fact that we irrationally hate their religion.Yeah, maybe that came out wrong. I think what people are talking about on here is the right to do something versus the sensibility of doing it. They certainly have the right to build the mosque. But like it or not, the religion they practice is blamed with killing 3000 people just up the road from where they want to build. Throw in the idea that they build mosques in areas that they have "conquered" and you get a nice controversy going.
More than anything else I feel that the propsed Mosque is in bad taste. Nothing more, nothing less. If a sect of 19 crazy christians went to foriegn soil and killed over 3,000 people (all of different race, religion, etc) I think that it would be in poor taste for a group of well intentioned Christians to come along 10 years after the fact and try to build any type of Christian house of worship near the site.
Let's be completely honest about the Mosque: There's probably other sites that this building could be put. People are simply pushing the issue because it is their right to build where they wish, which is indeed true, but I'll say it again: Just because something is your right, doesn't always make it a good idea.
In much of the coverage by the mainstream Obama-mania media, Islam and Muslims have been portrayed as the victims in the heated debate about the mosque’s construction. “The victims are the three thousand people that were slaughtered on 9/11 in that unprovoked attack. Not an attack that we were an accessory to, as the Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf suggests. The families were the victims. It’s not Islam that is the victim here,” said Sean.
The Tolerant Pose
Sean mentioned an article appearing in today’s NationalReviewOnline.com { Article} in which the author, Andrew McCarthy raises several questions about intolerance within the Islamic faith. McCarthy explains how intolerance isn’t just a part of Al-Qaeda, but is a part of Islam as well. McCarthy writes, “Non-Muslims are barred from entering the cities of Mecca and Medina — not merely barred from building synagogues or churches, but barred, period, because their infidel feet are deemed unfit to touch the ground. This is not an al-Qaeda principle. Nor is it an “Islamist” principle. It is Islam, pure and simple.” McCarthy continues, “Saudi Arabia does not have any law but sharia. Non-Muslims are discriminated against in the kingdom, not because that’s how the Saudis want it. They are discriminated against because that is how the Koran says it must be.” The article argues that there are Muslims who want to change this, those who want to evolve their faith into the light of ecumenical tolerance, Muslims who crave true religious liberty and reject sharia’s repression. McCarthy concludes that if Obama actually had an “unshakable” commitment to religious freedom — he would help those Muslims who reject sharia law.
Isn't it funny how a strip club can be placed just as close if not closer and there's no outrage. Yet, a cultural/religious center cannot be constructed without protest and outrage.
So apparently people are more tolerant of porn than religion.
Apparently people find using naked women more acceptable than prayer or social integration.
Apparently it's more patriotic to have a strip club near ground zero than a cultural center.
Funny.
Here's some more food for thought:
https://www.hannity.com/show/2010/08/17
“Saudi Arabia does not have any law but sharia. Non-Muslims are discriminated against in the kingdom, not because that’s how the Saudis want it. They are discriminated against because that is how the Koran says it must be.”
McCarthy concludes that if Obama actually had an “unshakable” commitment to religious freedom — he would help those Muslims who reject sharia law.
There's a McDonald's, Burger King and Adult peep show (among other things) all within the same distance from ground zero that the proposed mosque would be. Hallowed ground indeed.
Are trhey saying we need to be more intolerant, like Saudi Arabia? I don't see how this relates at all to a mosque being in NYC.
Imagine that on Sept. 11, 2001, a group of crazy fundamentalist Christians bombed a tower in the Middle East — let's say, Iran. Hundreds or even thousands of lives were lost, including both people who worked in the tower and emergency responders. Now, nine years later, would anybody even consider building a Catholic cathedral, a Baptist church, or an LDS meetinghouse two blocks away from the site of that tragedy?
So, McCarthy thinks President Obama should get involved in a religious movement to help Muslims? It's just strange.
Aren't those who reject the Sharia law just considered apostates?
Wouldn't it basically be like a Christian rejecting the 10 commandments?
Why should Obama be involved in any of this? Doesn't he have a country to run? An economy to save?
Are the people who stop being LDS to join the Jehovah's Witnesses apostates, or is it the Jehovah's Witnesses who beome LDS that are apostate?
There's a McDonald's, Burger King and Adult peep show (among other things) all within the same distance from ground zero that the proposed mosque would be. Hallowed ground indeed.
Islam has it's Five Pillars, none of which mention Sharia law.
So they don't care about the contents of Qur'an?
So they don't care about the contents of Qur'an?
There's a McDonald's, Burger King and Adult peep show (among other things) all within the same distance from ground zero that the proposed mosque would be. Hallowed ground indeed.