Progress! i would like to congratulate liberals the victory they gained with a activist judge

[idestroyedthetoilet]

Lol, forget it. I think, you, babe, and myself were the only ones reading your exchange with babe. The two of you did a remarkable job of sounding like babe is all. You had to be there, but wait, you were, lol.

But, as for Reagan's name appearing in bold type in my quote from that link, well, I'm gonna say may God strike me dead if I'm lying, I swear on my mother's grave, I did not use bold type. I tried yesterday to figure out how that happened, but had to give up. When I started to think only a paranormal explanation would work, I gave up, lol.

Following Dutch's post, the next logical thing to do was look up the judge in question. Not as a " gotcha", although of course it is difficult to visualize a judge appointed by Reagan as matching Dutch's description. But that's not my fault.

I'm deleting the link to that old thread I referenced. That was petty of me to post that.

My apology. I've been on a rant for a week and stepping out of line. Your response was fine and I am sorry for a mistreated response.

If you want the history of me for some reason being accused of being some of the several certified geniuses on the board like NAOS, babe, hopper, OB, etc. then I'll get into it. You are a genius too so I guess you are next in line for me being thought is you having a conversation with myself.

 

[One Brow]

do i have unrefutable Proof? no i do not! do you no you do not

Proof is for mathematics and alcohol. Science has evidence, and all the reliable evidence points away from creationism (which has nothing to do with the Big Bang).

gopod to know you finally a gree that scientific studies dont mean anything!

In small numbers, scientific studies are prone to statistical errors and various interpretation biases.

fact is fgm is wrong and not comparable to male circumcision

Your definition of "fact" is as wrong-headed as every other part of your argument. FGM Type IV is a very close comparison to male circumcision.

 

[One Brow]

LOL. I'm waiting with baited breath to here someone explain how cutting off a little bit of unimportant skin is akin to genital mutation of women.

FGM Type IV is often the nicking of the ****oris, it often does not even involve skin removal. So, I'm waiting with baited breath for someone to explain how a procedure that removes skin is less bad than one that does not.

A procedure that is done on baby girls out of self-rligious indignation.

MGM is done to baby boys out of self-religious indignation. Is that acceptable because they are boys?

So, the mental thought factory of the religious indoctrination haters have them irrationally hating something religion-based, foreskin cutting off, that they simply cant handle because it is based entirely out of their hate for a religious indoctrination practice. Can you explain yourselves in a way they can understand you are important to? Or we can continue on hating each other and fighting over perceived individuals injustices.

Why do you think this is something I can or can not "handle", whatever that is supposed to mean?

 

[Red]

My apology. I've been on a rant for a week and stepping out of line. Your response was fine and I am sorry for a mistreated response.

If you want the history of me for some reason being accused of being some of the several certified geniuses on the board like NAOS, babe, hopper, OB, etc. then I'll get into it. You are a genius too so I guess you are next in line for me being thought is you having a conversation with myself.

Really, no apology necessary. I get out of line at times myself, take things personally, or too seriously. It's the internet. A convenient means of communication, but far from perfect, that's for sure. And I do value your point of view. All is good.

Woops. Forgot to add. I am no genius!

 

[One Brow]

The antis have never been able to explain to me how the Genesis story follows the evolution theory 100 percent.

Because it doesn't.

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CH/CH801.html

 

[idestroyedthetoilet]

FGM Type IV is often the nicking of the ****oris, it often does not even involve skin removal. So, I'm waiting with baited breath for someone to explain how a procedure that removes skin is less bad than one that does not.

You are on about the specifics of this court case and I took your earlier words about it at face value as correct FWIW. Thank you for the follow up detail.

MGM is done to baby boys out of self-religious indignation.

What you call mutilation is seen by others as the same as clipping toenails as being mutilation. You going to tell me clipping fingernails and cutting a child's hair is mutilation too?

Is that acceptable because they are boys?

What point are you trying to make here?

Why do you think this is something I can or can not "handle", whatever that is supposed to mean?

You have a long history. You've told me that that should be taken into account. Am I not supposed to listen to what you say and portray?

 

[One Brow]

What you call mutilation is seen by others as the same as clipping toenails as being mutilation. You going to tell me clipping fingernails and cutting a child's hair is mutilation too?

What point are you trying to make here?

Part rant against mutilating any baby's genitals, part pointing out that it is hypocrisy to defend MGM and condemn Type IV FGM.

You have a long history. You've told me that that should be taken into account. Am I not supposed to listen to what you say and portray?

How does my history factor into your determination that I could not "handle" the reality of MGM?

 

[idestroyedthetoilet]

Part rant against mutilating any baby's genitals, part pointing out that it is hypocrisy to defend MGM and condemn Type IV FGM.



How does my history factor into your determination that I could not "handle" the reality of MGM?

Wanting others to understand what they are complaining about is fair IMO.

 

[TroutBum]

Explain to me religious people like @colton @jazzspazz or whatever your name is now, @LogGrad98 @TroutBum or anyone else religious if that is a reasonable possibility. I've asked people from UTC but they are hyper religious and dont think evolution exists so cant relate to the question at all.

How in the wide world of sports does my name come up with the likes of that idiotic fanatic Jazzspazz or an intellectual like Colton, I’ll never know. You’re barking up the wrong tree here, Brother M.

Woops. Forgot to add. I am no genius!

I will second and third this.

As for circumcising, the appearance of an uncut dong is just about the foulest thing I can think of. Praise all the gods my folks had me sliced; even as a kid, that extra 13lbs of skin would’ve just been a bother.

 

[idestroyedthetoilet]

How in the wide world of sports does my name come up with the likes of that idiotic fanatic Jazzspazz or an intellectual like Colton, I’ll never know. You’re barking up the wrong tree here, Brother M.



I will second and third this.

As for circumcising, the appearance of an uncut dong is just about the foulest thing I can think of. Praise all the gods my folks had me sliced; even as a kid, that extra 13lbs of skin would’ve just been a bother.

My barking didn't try to bite off 13 lbs, so what's the problem Brother B?

 

[TroutBum]

My barking didn't try to bite off 13 lbs, so what's the problem Brother B?

My problem is being referred to as some sort of religious person. I have a reputation to uphold, dick.

 

[idestroyedthetoilet]

My problem is being referred to as some sort of religious person. I have a reputation to uphold, dick.

I have to take my middle fishing today or tomorrow again because The Berry was frozen over, despite reports. If you're in town...