Almost certainly. They're not trading for a better player than Gobert, sooo...Do you think the Jazz's front office would ignore all trade possibilities that involve Gobert?
Almost certainly. They're not trading for a better player than Gobert, sooo...Do you think the Jazz's front office would ignore all trade possibilities that involve Gobert?
To be fair, Favors obviously was not the "100%" he insisted he was.We didn't have Rubio in the playoffs and the Favors/Gobert pairing was unplayable.
For **** sake, we cannot play them next to each other in the playoffs. The other team will simply put a SF at PF and run us out of the gym. It might be different if one of the 2 had a post game, but they dont.
Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
Every analyst, beat writer and anyone who's watched the Jazz that understand basketball knows there's a problem with Favors and Gobert on the floor - especially with Rubio.
Omg fish is back
Fish
Alec Burks tho
He played enough minutes to play him with Gobert. Quin specifically did not play them together. They do not work in the postseason.To be fair, Favors obviously was not the "100%" he insisted he was.
If you finish reading what I wrote you'll see what I was getting at...Wait, who is saying that there is no problem with the Gobert, Rubio, and favors lineup?
We have much more than a 5 game sample that the Jazz struggle offensively with Gobert and Favors. It's evident, 25 games into the season, some pieces need to be moved. Tell me, are you satisfied with the Jazz's play this year when Gobert plays? Their offense when he plays is some of the worst I've ever seen.
Gobert is my favorite player on the team. I love the guy and his game. I just think, if the pieces were right, the Jazz could move him and be better off. I think the same way about Favors. I wish I could say the same for Rubio, but I'd trade him for the ghost of Larry Miller's leg at this point.
If you finish reading what I wrote you'll see what I was getting at...
Write what I said after what you quoted. That's the point. It's simple.I doubt it
It’s interesting that you often have to tell people repeatedly what you mean in what you post. I often see you telling people things like “reading comprehension matters” and things like that. Or saying things like “I never said that” or “that’s not what I meant”
Maybe you need to do a better job making your point clear when you post.
I have no idea what point you are trying to make in this particular discussion. That happens a lot with you.
Here is what you posted after what I previously quoted.Saying this doesn't make someone stupid. Saying this doesn't mean Gobert sucks. Saying this doesn't mean Gobert should be traded. I say this because it's a fact. If you choose to ignore it, it's your agenda.
Like I've said, I'd keep Gobert over Favors. I'd entertain the right pieces for Gobert though. To me, he's certainly not untouchable in today's game. I think the Jazz's front office, deep down, feels the same too.If the Jazz offense struggle with Gobert and Favors, you just don't get rid of the superior player between the 2, you keep Gobert.
Curious about those "right pieces", there's not a lot of players that can bring the type of game changing skill set that Gobert offers, either defensively or offensively, and most of them are considered untouchable on their respective teams, what names are you thinking of? Realistically of course.
Hey Donovan's #1 fan: what happens when he wins too many games and the Jazz are just left without any other pieces to build around?
Again, the Jazz don't play well with Gobert and Favors - everyone seems to agree. Saying Gobert could be traded, at this point, is not far off and/or stupid like people have made said idea seem to be, which is my point.Here is what you posted after what I previously quoted.
So you don’t think Gobert sucks and don’t think he should be traded.
Ok. We agree.
Again, the Jazz don't play well with Gobert and Favors - everyone seems to agree. Saying Gobert could be traded, at this point, is not far off and/or stupid like people have made said idea seem to be, which is my point.
I've agreed with trading Favors before Gobert and have said that multiple times.I agree that trading gobert for a top 5 player wouldn’t be stupid. I think most people agree.
Good point.
A better point and what makes even more sense is to just trade the worse player of the two who is older and not under contract past this year.
I've agreed with trading Favors before Gobert and have said that multiple times.
I don't think Gobert is worth a top 5 player in the NBA. I do think he's worth an all-star level player, potential all star and/or draft picks though.
Do you really think Gobert is a top 5/6 player in the NBA right now?Well I’ll be damned
Do you really think Gobert is a top 5/6 player in the NBA right now?