The line of thinking "Oh, since most players come over when they are young, that must mean it's impossible for a player to come over at 30 and be good." is utterly stupid.
Who are the good Euros who have come over late in their career other than Sabonis?
My bad I didn't realize there were youtubes of him making shots in Olympic play and pre-season games...
Didn't Carlos arroyo rip USA apart one year?
Its absolutely fair to be skeptical that this guy can produce in the NBA. I don't care if he beat the timberwolves in the preseason.
Instead of youtubes... how about that example?
The line of thinking "Oh, since most players come over when they are young, that must mean it's impossible for a player to come over at 30 and be good." is utterly stupid.
Who are the good Euros who have come over late in their career other than Sabonis?
I'm sorry, that is a horrendously stupid line of thought. Teodosic could have come to the NBA 4 years ago if he wanted. He has had an open invite for a while. You are acting like this dude just blew up in Europe and is some flash in the pan. The level of disrespect you have for his game rn is embarrassing.
Not what I said jackass... I said I can't think of one... just one example where it has been successful. I'm not looking for the mean I'm looking for one damn outlier... ONE.
I'm sorry, that is a horrendously stupid line of thought. Teodosic could have come to the NBA 4 years ago if he wanted. He has had an open invite for a while. You are acting like this dude just blew up in Europe and is some flash in the pan. The level of disrespect you have for his game rn is embarrassing.
So you are saying statistically the NBA is due?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiGbfz0hhLg&t=42s
Please spare me the "It's just pre-season"
Yup. Its a laughable argument.I'm not saying anything, really. If the argument is that other positions can make it late in their careers but PGs can't because there's no precedent, then that's a meaningless statistic because of very limited sample size. So far we've got three players mentioned of any position so saying it's PGs I don't think is all that accurate. I think a better explanation is that really talented guys will come over earlier. Nocioni was 24 and Kukoc 25. Sabonis was 30.
Who cares? Evaluate the talent, not some other PG's who came over later in their career. Utterly stupid line of thought.
I don't think it makes much sense to look at other players or situations. I think it makes the most sense to look at his game. He has an NBA game offensively, but even in his current leagues he has a decent amount of TO's to go with those great assists. He's absolutely a good/great NBA level shooter,and has excellentt ball handling ability. He's also going to struggle defensively, and he's never played in such a rigorous, long season.
He looks like he doesn't take care off himself incredibly well, and as he gets older that could lead to injuries, or an earlier drop-off in his ability.
The Jazz also need to think about if bringing a guy like him over makes sense for their team depending on who else is on the roster. Is he a definite NBA starter on a top team? I don't think you can say that. I don't know if it makes sense for the Jazz to bring him in unless they consider Exum a bust/non PG, or they aren't planning on bringing back Hill. I guess if Hayward is on board I'd be fine rolling with him in a platoon with Exum for a year or two. But I'm higher on Exum than some people, who might want to move on immediately.
Edit: In that case he'd be an ideal backup. But he reportedly only wants to start.
When this guy ends up going to the Spurs and crushing it, I'm blaming HH.