RandyForRubio
Well-Known Member
I just don't agree.Its interesting. I do feel we would have won more games with Teague than Hill. Having an NBA starting quality PG for 31 more games of the season would have led to more wins. Over 49 games, I bet we win 3 more games with Hill over Teague. Over 33 games, I bet we win 6 more games with Teague instead of no Hill.
The flip side - we were a better team with Hill than I imagine with Teague. He "fits better" than I imagine Teague would have. And I also don't think we would be trying to keep Teague right now the same way we are hoping to keep Hill.
So my breakdown is this - if Hill does not stay, we made the wrong choice because we would have won more games. If he does, it was a great trade.
Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
If we don't have Hill, Hayward is for sure gone. We NEEDED to win a playoff series.
Now Hayward might stay. That's because we did well this last year. We did well because we had Hill. And honestly, I don't think anybody predicted Hill getting the money he's going to get. DL rightfully thought we could resign him to a decent deal. Didn't work out. I'm ok with that. It was still the right move to get the better player for our team.