Search results

Too be honest with you, I think we need some solid Vets that have been winners. I'd do this and call it an off-season You all might hate this but, I'd gamble on the following moves (will have to overpay on both) Paul Pierce (3 year deal) 10 million, 9 million, 8 million (t.o half...

The guy said additional salary coming to the Jazz. Tristin thompson or waiters? Varanasi?

I tend to agree that the deal to be made, will be with the Bucks. I don't hate Irasolva or Mayo for that matter. With the proper coach and health both can be rotational players. Both bring shooting and respectable #'s for there salaries, if it doesn't work, both will be expiring contracts...

So if Exum is there at 5, do you trade the pick? Maybe to Boston for 6th and 17th? or Philly's 10th pick , a handful of 2nd picks, with Thad Young? Or to Chicago for there 2 picks plus Butler?

If Utah think Parker or Wiggins will be a star ( franchise player) why not gamble? With the # 2 pick you could probably have either one of them. I do agree that Kanter/Burks will be better then Mayo/Irasolva, if Mayo has 2 years left at 8 mill, per year and Irasolva is 7.9 million over 2...

I'd rather trade 5, 23, 35 kanter and burks for irasolva, mayo, delfino and the 2nd pick. Salary dump for the bucks, while adding some young solid players & have some solid picks. Jazz get a chance at Wiggins or Parker and yes add salary. But add some much needed shooting. Burke / f.a...

Jazz trade 5th pick, 23rd pick, Kanter, Burks Bucks Trade 2nd pick, Oj Mayo (2 yrs left @ 8 mil per) , Carlos Defino (2 yrs left @ 3.25 mil per) Jazz do it because they get their star in Parker or Wiggins, move Hayward (resigned) to starting 2, address some weakness with 3 pt shooting in...

Id agree, I'd love to see bucks not get the top 1 or 2 picks but I think they do! What would be really funny, Philadelphia falling to 4 or 5. Readings hawes & turner for a few 2nd to secure a high pick. Sadly , I see Lakers & Boston having a ton of luck with top 3 picks :-(

I like parsons at the 3 with Hayward at the 2. I think it could work out well and let Kanter/Burks/ our picks be a solid 2nd unit. Plus, pick up assets while u still can. Parsons/Hayward similar yes but there's nothing wrong with 2 shooters thats can set up other teammates?

Why don't we speed up the rebuild? I know Jazz want some flexibility but, why don't they aggressively pursue the likes of Parsons if he is a restricted FA. Throw some money his way and get a solid SF, (maybe Marvin Williams money from last season...8 or 9 millions for 4 years?) Houston might...

Freak no!!

Id make that trade for both there picks. 16 & 19 then try and move up with some combo of r picks. Or keep them all and go super young/rookie bench. Save your cap flexibility, add some potential rotation players and really rebuild with all your young guys. With a new coach in place.

Sounds as if bpa when jazz draft will be a big. So im all in for throwing a max deal at Bledsoe and letting him do his thing. Id go Bledsoe over Westbrook and I'd resign hayward too. Worst case jazz get Bledsoe at max and if it doesn't work we can always trade him. Lets use this cap space...

I thought it was worth a watch.

Sign Greg Monroe! Add Wiggins or Parker, g.s. pick , resign hayward/marvin. Call it a rebuild

Agreed, trade him to phx for there 3 picks next year

Agreed!

I must have missed something? I don't get?

I agree, he might really suprise a whole bunch of people. Plus, its a contract year for him. I think he will be pretty decent actually. And he's still kind of young.

Dang, that's awesome!