What's new

Coronavirus

I haven't looked it up but I remember reading that the new 911 security has yet to stop a single incident either. I think it's been largely ineffective. People trying to get things past security have been able to. Although maybe it's more to scare people away to begin with. Kind of like a fake cameras around your house.
I think it’s misguided. There are plenty of holes in the system. I can think of at least one really easy way to get a lot of stuff through security. It’s very obviously but I’ve never shared it publicly. In any case, someone plotting some legit terrorism isn’t going to be foiled by these changing color days “****! They raised the alert and we have to take off our shoes!”
 
I think it’s misguided. There are plenty of holes in the system. I can think of at least one really easy way to get a lot of stuff through security. It’s very obviously but I’ve never shared it publicly. In any case, someone plotting some legit terrorism isn’t going to be foiled by these changing color days “****! They raised the alert and we have to take off our shoes!”
I don't like traveling through airports in China due to the extra attention from security I receive. But I'm very grateful that I don't have to take off my damn shoes here, lol. And maybe I like the extra full body pat downs they give me from all the all female security staff...
 
@infection

A mysterious company's coronavirus papers in top medical journals may be unraveling...

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...papers-top-medical-journals-may-be-unraveling
It will be interesting to see what comes of it. My biggest questions regarding this have been the differences in mortality and the reported reduced mortality with ACE-inhibitors, the latter going completely contrary to everything that's been said previously. I know that there was question regarding the sizes claimed as of the dates listed, that there were discrepancies based on how many people were actually hospitalized as of certain dates. In any case, I do have questions about how they're mining some of the data (such as VTach that runs >6 seconds.... how is that showing up in a chart that they can mine those things?). Anyway, not saying there aren't answers. Will just have to wait. But if there are issues here that drastically compromise what their findings were, I think it's overall good for society come to grips with this. There's been a large deification of science without properly understanding what that means (if people were surveyed on what that term even meant, there would be no consistencies because it's a catchall for so many different things). In any case, for a long period of time you had religious institutions exerting a large amount of influence throughout communities and the world on what people thought. There were very simplistic views on things and there was a sense of literalism with which people would interpret scripture as well as inerrant views on religious leadership. As these views have started to significantly change over time, and as we've got more liberal in our interpretations of religious experience, we've felt an undying, yet largely unconscious, need to seek for authority and absolutism that eases our anxieties about the complexities of the world and our existence. Right now as a society, our approach to science is currently at the phase of acceptance by authority, and understandings and readings of the literature being done in the same way that more fundamentalist religious practitioners may view and implement their scripture, without a very nuanced understanding of knowing how all those beliefs and writings came to be.

I good approach on "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False":

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1182327/
 
China had a small outbreak in Wuhan. So they locked it down and tested almost 10 million people. The results (if you believe them) are only 300 people tested positive but we're asymptomatic. China doesn't count asymptomatic into their official numbers. But they do quarantine until they test negative. I really wish they had either done a antibody test or if they did release those numbers.

Also Beijing had it's party meeting that just ended. So the city is opening up a lot now. A lot of people were still afraid to go out because they didn't believe the government that there were little to no cases and it was safe to go back out. But since the party leaders were all here and freely moving around most people believe it must be safe because they wouldn't be anywhere near an unsafe area.
 
Everything doesn't have to be a lie. It is likely that the president was taking hydroxychloroquine despite your lawyer-speak analysis of the documents. I have taken that drug before. Lots of people have. The people who have convinced you that it is so dangerous are only doing so because they want to gin up yet another controversy. The desire to turn everything single thing this president says or does into a controversy is asinine.
Well, we do have an asinine president

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Study from the Lancet being retracted.

Today, three of the authors of the paper, "Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis", have retracted their study. They were unable to complete an independent audit of the data underpinning their analysis. As a result, they have concluded that they "can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources." The Lancet takes issues of scientific integrity extremely seriously, and there are many outstanding questions about Surgisphere and the data that were allegedly included in this study. Following guidelines from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), institutional reviews of Surgisphere’s research collaborations are urgently needed.

The retraction notice is published today, June 4, 2020. The article will be updated to reflect this retraction shortly.

https://www.thelancet.com/lancet/ar...E9AmBHSiBAXFup18wm29xChrKpYKrGe90UYz0aFz-6_5A
 
Will be an interesting question to have schools opened in the fall. If a student or teacher tests positive, it’s a hard sell to just continually close schools.

My company told me to work the rest of the year from home.
 
Back
Top