Blake Griffin didn't play for a year either. I expect a Griffin-like season from Kanter.
But he was the #1 pick in a stronger draft .. lol. Love how we all analyze everything in every way imagineable, really.
Blake Griffin didn't play for a year either. I expect a Griffin-like season from Kanter.
But he was the #1 pick in a stronger draft .. lol. Love how we all analyze everything in every way imagineable, really.
sigh...
post...
players....
in europe...
Guys, lets wait for him to put on a Jazz jersey and play in our system. There's a reason why these twigs like AK and Jonas look like magic and kareem internationally. There's a reason why Duncan, Boozer, Amare, and Dwight don't look nearly as good as these euros that chuck up 3's. Remember that one guy who was drafted by the Pacers a few years back? He was that white PG that stared down Lamar Odom?
Hell, if we just looked at international play, Carlos Arroyo would totally own Dwill, CP3, and Jason Kidd.
Lets keep in mind, that Kanter is a low post player. In order for him to be effective, he needs to have plays run for him. He needs to do something other than set screens out on the perimeter for average 3 point chuckers who have no clue on how to run the pick and roll.
Remember folks, Kanter plays with Hedo. Hedo doesn't even give the ball up to Dwight Howard. Why... Oh why, would he give the ball up to Kanter?
Kanter's going to be fine. Worse case: He's a rookie boozer.
A guy that can come in, bang, get some boards, and score points inside off Dharris, Burcks, and Hayward breaking down the defense. Before getting his raise, regardless...
if Cousins was playing for Turkey, he would have sucked *** too.
Yes, that was my original post. Sorry, no link. I was there when they played. I never said 'he dominated Cousins and it wasn't even close', though. I said Kanter got the better of Cousins and got him pretty frustrated. Neither of them are elite athletes, but both are very big, very strong, incredible rebounders, and above average shooters (both have NBA range). Kanter seemed to play much more under control, made much better decisions, moved with and without the ball better, and just seemed a tiny bit better at everything. I'm not saying he IS better, just saying that both were absolutely going at each other and everyone there came to the same conclusion .. that Enes was at least the slightly better player.
I also quoted Josh Harrellson;
Reporter: "You've played against some pretty tough competition in 4 years in the SEC. Of everyone you've played against, including your own teammates, who is the best you've gone up against?"
Josh: "Enes Kanter, definitely."
Reporter: "That includes Demarcus? You're saying Enes is better than Demarcus?"
Josh: "Demarcus is a really good player, one of the best. I'm not taking anything away from him, at all, but I've never played against anyone as strong and tough to play against as Enes."
Disclaimer: The above Josh quotes are not word for word, but very close .. just going by memory.
Very, very true. There's not a big in the NBA that could put up "dominating" numbers with that horrid ball distribution.
This thread shouldn't even be focusing on Kanter's performance in three games, but rather the continued lack of information that we can actually judge the kid on. If positions 1-3 are only out for themselves and seem to think the paint is lava, we gain nothing from analyzing our 3rd round pick.
I'm not saying anyone is right or wrong, but the fact of the matter is that anyone here that claims they have a conclusion as to what kind of player Kanter will be in the NBA needs to get a butt flap installed on their pants. It's tough to hear you guys talking out of your asses when it's all muffled.
Probably because Cousins doesn't try during practices/scrimmages, too busy eating donuts.
I agree. Enes is raw. You have to figure Jefferson, Favors and Millsap are all in line to get 30 mins each. If Okur comes back, he takes the remaining minutes. Even if Millsap plays some 3, there isn't much PT for Kanter unless one of the bigs misses some games. But that's ok; Kanter was drafted 3rd because of his potential, not because he's ready to be a starter. Regardless of what he does as a rookie, I think you need to wait 3-4 years to see how he develops before you can really judge the pick.15-20 probably pushing it. I see 8-12 with tons on dnps.
I agree. Enes is raw. You have to figure Jefferson, Favors and Millsap are all in line to get 30 mins each. If Okur comes back, he takes the remaining minutes. Even if Millsap plays some 3, there isn't much PT for Kanter unless one of the bigs misses some games. But that's ok; Kanter was drafted 3rd because of his potential, not because he's ready to be a starter. Regardless of what he does as a rookie, I think you need to wait 3-4 years to see how he develops before you can really judge the pick.
If this scenario comes true as you propose, then this is worse than the Fesenko Fail, given that (1) Kanter probably has more combined talent (offensively and defensively) than Fes, and (2) Kanter is a far higher priority as a 3rd pick overall. Because of (2), I do believe that Kanter will get more burn than Fes (not that doing so is hard).I agree. Enes is raw. You have to figure Jefferson, Favors and Millsap are all in line to get 30 mins each. If Okur comes back, he takes the remaining minutes. Even if Millsap plays some 3, there isn't much PT for Kanter unless one of the bigs misses some games. But that's ok; Kanter was drafted 3rd because of his potential, not because he's ready to be a starter. Regardless of what he does as a rookie, I think you need to wait 3-4 years to see how he develops before you can really judge the pick.
I am just not sure people understand that. Some suggest we should trade Jefferson because they think Kanter is already better than him now.
Not sure your basis for saying this. Big Al made strides this year, improving his shot variety, and even playing defense. With more effort and skill development, he could be a cornerstone. A frontcourt of Jefferson/Favors, Hayward/Millsap, and and Kanter/(Fesenko or replacement) has the potential of being very good.It is not who is better but Jefferson will not provide us anything in the long term anymore.
Wow some of you guys are in mid-season form with your negative comments. These are practice games with guys who haven't even played that much together. Considering Kanter has not played in over a year and he is playing with the national team for the first time, I think everyone should calm down and relax. Claiming Kanter a bust at this point makes you look pretty silly and dumb. I also think everyone should lower their expectations a little on Kanter. He is going to take some time but I think he will become a solid player.
Not sure your basis for saying this. Big Al made strides this year, improving his shot variety, and even playing defense. With more effort and skill development, he could be a cornerstone. A frontcourt of Jefferson/Favors, Hayward/Millsap, and and Kanter/(Fesenko or replacement) has the potential of being very good.
For me it doesnt bring us any good to limit Kanter and Favors playing time just to grab 5-6 more wins this year. .
One problem with your argument: every once in a while, Jefferson played "the defense". So he sucks "in the defense" at least in part because he doesn't try and/or isn't focused--and because this coaching staff (and the coaching regime that preceded it) didn't enforce defense (even thought they gave lip service to it).My idea for Jefferson is quite clear and it wont change too easily. He is talented and has good foot skills in the post. But he sucks in the defense.
If the Jazz can get a really good guard out of AJ, then maybe I'd consider a trade. But AJ is making too much to be particularly tradeable, and a legit team needs at least 3 legit players at the 4/5 spot. (Millsap counts for only 90% of a legit player heightwise /ducking/).Just making a couple of blocks doesnt prove you are a good defender which Jefferson is really clumsy and doesnt know where to take position in defense. He has some good offensive skills but it is a big weakness not to have a consistent mid range jump shot. In normal season it may not hurt us much but in playoff it will limit Big Al and our offense so much.
Probably he will stay 1 more and will be the leading scoring in the team, but it still doesnt make him cornerstone or something. I would trade Big Al right now, get a good pg or maybe a good draft pick for this year, and let Kanter - Favors start right away with all their faults while millsap is taking major mins off the bench. Maybe they will struggle a lot for this year but it will help them grow much quicker. For me it doesnt bring us any good to limit Kanter and Favors playing time just to grab 5-6 more wins this year. We should draw our path clearly and move on instead of relying on Harris or Jefferson. I also dont believe that Big Al wants to commit his future with us, he seemed too frustrated last year in that chaotic time.
I agree with this statement, but how do wemknow kanter will be even half the player jefferson is now. Even the "rational" people are saying in this weak draft we should be happy with just a decent player. Favors is the future of the jazz. Kanter will be a nice starter for us, but those that say he is going to be better than 16 and 8, ahem pkm, are just as "dumb" as me saying he is bust at 3. My defenition of a bust at 3 is a dude who get 13 and 7 and cant d up against athletic post players or score against athletic post players. He is not crafty enough to have no explosion. He will get his *** handed to him every game. I hope i am wrong, but the euro big translation to the nba has not been a very successful one.