Why is he now? You seem to believe a fully healthy player is being held out of a playoff game. I'm not the one dealing in absurdities here.Then why wasn't he on the injury report on Saturday?
Why is he now? You seem to believe a fully healthy player is being held out of a playoff game. I'm not the one dealing in absurdities here.Then why wasn't he on the injury report on Saturday?
The explanation is public: They weren't 1000% comfortable after his shoot-around today and figured they can afford to be as cautious as possible.Why is he now?
And yet you seem to believe the Jazz left him off the injury report... for fun?Why is he now? You seem to believe a fully healthy player is being held out of a playoff game. I'm not the one dealing in absurdities here.
Soooooooooooooooooooooooooo he's not better, then? Or you seriously believe that he is and they are just holding him out for fun?The explanation is public: They weren't 1000% comfortable after his shoot-around today and figured they can afford to be as cautious as possible.
Your faith in this invented binary is silly. He is not better or he would be playing. This is maybe the stupidest thing I've had to explain to someone on the site.And yet you seem to believe the Jazz left him off the injury report... for fun?
lol
For the third and last time, they're holding him out to be as cautious as possible.Soooooooooooooooooooooooooo he's not better, then? Or you seriously believe that he is and they are just holding him out for fun?
That is straight up preposterous.
Or even 90% IMHOYour faith in this invented binary is silly. He is not better or he would be playing. This is maybe the stupidest thing I've had to explain to someone on the site.
They can call it whatever they want. He would be playing if he was 100%.
If it were against the Lakers, or later in the series, I bet he would be playing.
Nobody is saying he's 100%.Your faith in this invented binary is silly. He is not better or he would be playing. This is maybe the stupidest thing I've had to explain to someone on the site.
They can call it whatever they want. He would be playing if he was 100%.
So you agree he's less than or equal to 90%? Cuuuuuuuuuuuuz...If it were against the Lakers, or later in the series, I bet he would be playing.
Oh................................. k..............................Nobody is saying he's 100%.
Eliza Hughes gets his chance.Oh................................. k..............................
So explain to me what you think I am saying.
This whole argument started because I posted the tweets of what the Jazz said and you replied with this:Oh................................. k..............................
So explain to me what you think I am saying.
So you seem to be accusing the Jazz of lying or being deceitful. If that's wrong, then you worded it very poorly.So, cool, great that we have these tweets from good sources. However, that doesn't mean these are facts and this organization is notorious for being tight-lipped so you'll have to forgive those of us that are wary.
I don't appreciate the language of it being 'out of nothing but caution.' It does not stand to reason. This entire disagreement is about semantics, all of it. The truth is he is being held out because his ankle isn't right. They can re-word that however they like for PR purposes, and it can even be technically simultaneously true.This whole argument started because I posted the tweets of what the Jazz said and you replied with this:
So you seem to be accusing the Jazz of lying or being deceitful. If that's wrong, then you worded it very poorly.
Not sure I follow...