bump
Hi Lopo. I don't think there should be a "maybe" regarding the strength of schedule. It was simply way easier so it's not comparing apples to apples. Idiot did an interesting analysis some months ago that took into account strength of schedule.Thanks for taking time from your personal Conley parade to once again make zero contribution to the conversation.
I bet you'll be the exact same next year....
Fact:
We won at a better rate without Conley last year than we did with him. And yes, that includes maybe a softer regular season schedule, but also includes our playoff series.
Fact:
We are only 3 games into the season. Conley has played well. Kudos to him. He's playing in a very low stress role since he's playing off the ball. It's new to him and opponents. Let's not overexaggerate.
Lopo only uses context to hate on the players he dislikes.Hi Lopo. I don't think there should be a "maybe" regarding the strength of schedule. It was simply way easier so it's not comparing apples to apples. Idiot did an interesting analysis some months ago that took into account strength of schedule.
Mike has been playing well for months, including the bubble and playoffs. Even in game 7, he wasn't as dreadful as you claim. He ran the offense and provided good playmaking despite a poor shooting night. He also played some good defense on Murray when matched up, going over screens and contesting shoots.
I against because we give too much for him. Last year we lost edge required for Denver
Mind your language