I also love the idea of Grant, but I do worry about the role he wants. Supposedly, he wants to be one of the main focuses of the offense wherever he goes (if reports are true). I just don't see us adding another high usage offensive player to our system even if that player is as talented as Grant is in other areas of his game.
Yeah, if literally nobody wants him.
Oh yeah, Im 1000000% on the trade his *** for nothing train, but I also realize Donovan Mitchell has a vice grip on the organization and maybe that can't happen. Im just hopeful something changes with Butler/Forrest showing they can add fire to the team.
I mean define work? It’s highway robbery for us… so sure it works for us. Boston tells you to **** off.
Well hopefully the reports that he’s running the team gives the Jazz any incentive to stand up to him cuz it needs to happen.
No, Clarkson and Ingles would not work. That's too much money coming into the Celtics.
Financially, the trade works perfectly. Boston is right on the edge of the luxury, and this trade actually saves them half a million in salaries.
I've only seen one media member mention that Don is supposedly keeping Clarkson out of trade ideas. I really have never heard it before or since.
NO is said to want CJ, Gordon… I can see them settling on JC. They have a trade exception they could use or satoransky… maybe we add a pick and get Hart. I would think they’d really want to keep Hart but his name is out there a lot… and he can be a free agent after next year… so they may know he’s out. Shocked they didn’t do a deal for Norman Powell… they could have done something there pretty easily I’d think.
I heard somewhere it was more like Donovan would be part of those conversations… I wouldn’t want to if I was Donovan… and the Jazz really shouldn’t be consulting him.
No. It's an overblown storyline led by people who are trying to slander Don because we traded a 2nd for Paschall who many people liked regardless of him being being childhood friend of Don's.
I think it's wise for a front office to talk to their main players prior to a deal. It just makes sense to. Don't give them veto power, but feel them out. You have to know internally if the team is going to struggle if a certain player is dealt. It's also good to know if a player might be unwelcome if traded for.
I swear someone, maybe Locke, said he was the worst defensive big man in the nba last year. So definite no to Bagley.
You're starting to sound like another DM hater.
I am. I dont like his playstyle personally. (Though he was fantastic last night, but that's not the way he always chooses to play)
