I think GVC covered it pretty well already, but...
When out in public places it should be expected that you'll encounter varying degrees of intelligent life, and that on occasion those intelligent life-forms might attempt to make contact. It is each person's prerogative how they will respond to these efforts, but regardless, we should all put on our big boy and big girl pants and be prepared to deal with it.
First of all, complete apples to oranges. Why does it seem to be an equivalent situation to you?
Secondly, you certainly can do what you want to encourage me to join you, and I am free to ignore you completely, decline the invitation, or join you. And you are free to interpret my response however you choose. Why do you think you would feel entitled to have me play? And why do you think I would concern myself with your reaction to my response?
In the situation I described, I expected a response. Why do you think I would feel entitled to a response? Expecting something to happen is NOT the same as thinking I am entitled to have it happen.
If I throw a ball up in the air, I expect it to come down. That does not mean I feel entitled to have it come down. If you think that it does, then your definition of "entitled" is very different from mine.
To me, putting on the grown-up pants means taking a moment before I insert myself into someone's life, even just for a greeting.
It's interesting how focused posters seems to be on how others should react to them.
Your right to do so? Absolutely. My whole point has been about considering your effects on others, not what you have a right to do.
Lil dicky!!!Every time I read something like that I think of this video about how great it is to be a white dude. I'll post the link, but I won't embed it because it is NOT safe for work.
NSFW!
Lil Dicky - White Dude
https://youtube.com/watch?v=3rnFlQAvk8U
An in-person encounter is not the same as a post on a message board that you have no way of knowing whether or not I've even seen it.They seem similar in quality, but not in quantity. Both are requests of other people that you do something you don't want to do, the chess game is just a bigger time investment. Sure, greeting are much more customary than chess games, but I don't see that as removing the imposition. Outside of the level of time and that you feel one is customary while the other is not, why are they different to you?
When you're at the elevator and the door opens and there's one person already in the elevator, do you acknowledge that person? Or do you act as though they either don't exist or are invisible?In the hypothetical, I would have felt entitled to you playing because that what everyone does, or because it helps build a stronger community, or some similar reason. You should not have to concern yourself with my reaction to your response (in the particular case of men speaking to women on the street, the women don't have this luxury). My point is that the onus is on me in the initial approach to be reasonably certain that the attempt is welcome at all.
After 5 years of not getting a response, you still expect one? I find that hard to believe. I don't think you are saying "Good Morning" every day for five years and still expecting a response. Dig deeper.
Perhaps entitled does not describe you. What does?
I'm not defending my own behaviour in this thread..
Funny how you're reading it. No response is demanded or expected. I already said I don't catcall and I don't typically approach women in public. I probably follow your standard of assessing non-verbal cues to an extreme.
I just don't think it's reasonable to condemn people for saying "How you doin'."
I don't think a single person has expressed an opinion on how a women should respond to a "How you doin'" greeting. Other than to possibly say that going out in public and acting in an anti-social way is, well, anti-social.
So basically you're saying I can look at boobs but just don't be a creep about it? Cool.
An in-person encounter is not the same as a post on a message board that you have no way of knowing whether or not I've even seen it.
When you're at the elevator and the door opens and there's one person already in the elevator, do you acknowledge that person? Or do you act as though they either don't exist or are invisible?
How do others react if you're the one that's already on the elevator and they're the ones getting on? Is there any way you can generally categorize the responses - the percentage that acknowledge your presence in some way vs. those that seem as though they don't see you at all?
Do you feel that people just avoid looking at you at all?
No, I don't expect a response - I've certainly learned not to expect a response from this particular person. But if we do make eye-contact in passing (which happens more often than not) I still automatically smile and nod, though I don't say anything. He just continues to act as though he didn't see me. I don't take offense or anything, it just seems a bit odd and contrary to how most people would react.
n/c
I doubt my friends were all that different from most, and I'd be willing to bet that most people have some kind of a similar experience as a teen/early twenties, and many of the people making a federal case out of this are likely hypocrites.
There's no chance that they could be feeling regret over past actions? They must be hypocrites?
I did say "many" and "likely."
-
Why, are you feeling regret?
Ugly guy = creepy. Good looking guy = charming/romantic.
While I wasn't a cat-caller, I do have some regrets over my youth.
You once said hi to someone without getting a non verbal cue first?While I wasn't a cat-caller, I do have some regrets over my youth.
Ugly guy = creepy. Good looking guy = charming/romantic.